On Friday 15 January 2010 20:24:38 Sebastian Pipping wrote: > On 01/16/10 00:33, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > > - From the alternatives, /var/lib/layman doesn't sound right. If > > /var/cache/layman doesn't work, what about /var/spool/layman instead? > > Okay, how about > > /var/spool/layman > > then? Any objections?
/var/spool/ is a terrible idea -- these are not jobs being queued waiting to be processed by a daemon and then removed. if you want to keep all of layman's stuff together, then about your only option is to create your own tree at like /var/layman/. the better idea though would be to split your stuff along the proper lines. cache files = /var/cache/layman/ config files = /etc/layman/ -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
