Hi,
Joe Sapp nixpho...@gentoo.org:
Thanks for looking at this Christian.
Sorry for the late reply.
Patch to the original revision is attached.
I am fine with it.
V-Li
--
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode
В Вск, 07/02/2010 в 21:24 -0500, Mike Frysinger пишет:
it might also be useful to add a default epatch() to the initial env that
would be clobbered when the inherit occurred.
epatch() { die you need to inherit eutils.eclass to use epatch ; }
After fixing breakage that was introduced by
Hello. Please don't be too harsh if I got this wrong or if this looks
like whining :P
A lot of ebuilds seem to ignore the X USE flag and instead only have
gtk, qt and the like. This should be declared absolutely wrong,
IMHO. When a program provides a command-line tool and a GUI tool, and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 8.2.2010 12:15, Nikos Chantziaras napsal(a):
Hello. Please don't be too harsh if I got this wrong or if this looks
like whining :P
A lot of ebuilds seem to ignore the X USE flag and instead only have
gtk, qt and the like. This should be
On 08/02/10 11:15, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Hello. Please don't be too harsh if I got this wrong or if this looks
like whining :P
A lot of ebuilds seem to ignore the X USE flag and instead only have
gtk, qt and the like. This should be declared absolutely wrong,
IMHO. When a program
On 02/08/2010 01:30 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
Dne 8.2.2010 12:15, Nikos Chantziaras napsal(a):
Hello. Please don't be too harsh if I got this wrong or if this looks
like whining :P
A lot of ebuilds seem to ignore the X USE flag and instead only have
gtk, qt and the like. This should be
On Monday 08 February 2010 06:15:38 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
A lot of ebuilds seem to ignore the X USE flag and instead only have
gtk, qt and the like. This should be declared absolutely wrong,
IMHO. When a program provides a command-line tool and a GUI tool, and
the GUI tool uses only one
2010-02-08 01:20:22 Brian Harring napisał(a):
On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 12:17:17PM -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
I noticed that this generates a depedency like || (
=dev-lang/python-2.7* =dev-lang/python-2.6* ) which is very similar
to the way that QT3VERSIONS works in qt3.eclass. One thing that
2010-02-07 19:43:24 Markos Chandras napisał(a):
On Saturday 06 February 2010 13:03:11 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
wrote:
2010-02-05 17:40:00 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis napisał(a):
- Dependency on Python 2 should be set correctly. You can specify it
directly in
Hi,
Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de:
A Gnome user probably has X gtk -qt in make.conf, while a KDE user
has X qt -gtk in hope to have programs that support both Gtk and Qt
being built with the toolkit that is more native to his DE. When a
package has a GUI tool that is able to only use one
On 02/08/2010 01:36 PM, AllenJB wrote:
On 08/02/10 11:15, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Hello. Please don't be too harsh if I got this wrong or if this looks
like whining :P
A lot of ebuilds seem to ignore the X USE flag and instead only have
gtk, qt and the like. This should be declared
On 02/08/2010 02:12 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 02/08/2010 01:36 PM, AllenJB wrote:
On 08/02/10 11:15, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Hello. Please don't be too harsh if I got this wrong or if this looks
like whining :P
A lot of ebuilds seem to ignore the X USE flag and instead only have
2010-02-06 17:54:10 Mark Loeser napisał(a):
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org said:
2010-02-05 17:40:00 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis napisał(a):
I consider filing bugs for not adjusted packages after some months (e.g
in summer).
1123 packages (440 in
On 02/08/2010 01:39 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 02/08/2010 01:30 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
Dne 8.2.2010 12:15, Nikos Chantziaras napsal(a):
Hello. Please don't be too harsh if I got this wrong or if this looks
like whining :P
A lot of ebuilds seem to ignore the X USE flag and instead only
On 02/08/2010 02:11 PM, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
Hi,
Nikos Chantziarasrea...@arcor.de:
A Gnome user probably has X gtk -qt in make.conf, while a KDE user
has X qt -gtk in hope to have programs that support both Gtk and Qt
being built with the toolkit that is more native to his DE. When a
On 02/08/2010 02:16 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 02/08/2010 02:12 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 02/08/2010 01:36 PM, AllenJB wrote:
On 08/02/10 11:15, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Hello. Please don't be too harsh if I got this wrong or if this looks
like whining :P
A lot of ebuilds seem to
On 08/02/10 12:32, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 02/08/2010 01:39 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
IMHO. USE=X is for controlling X.org dependencies, not for avoiding
everything that deps on them, so I disagree.
I was under the impression that USE flags are for enabling/disabling
features, not for
On 02/08/2010 03:41 PM, AllenJB wrote:
On 08/02/10 12:32, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 02/08/2010 01:39 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
IMHO. USE=X is for controlling X.org dependencies, not for avoiding
everything that deps on them, so I disagree.
I was under the impression that USE flags are for
On 08/02/10 14:02, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 02/08/2010 03:41 PM, AllenJB wrote:
On 08/02/10 12:32, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 02/08/2010 01:39 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
IMHO. USE=X is for controlling X.org dependencies, not for avoiding
everything that deps on them, so I disagree.
I
Hi all,
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 02:34:08PM +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 02/08/2010 02:11 PM, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
Hi,
Nikos Chantziarasrea...@arcor.de:
A Gnome user probably has X gtk -qt in make.conf, while a KDE user
has X qt -gtk in hope to have programs that support
2010-02-06 13:14:41 Brian Harring napisał(a):
On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 12:03:11PM +0100, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
wrote:
2010-02-05 17:40:00 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis napisał(a):
- Dependency on Python 2 should be set correctly. You can specify it
directly in
On 8 February 2010 16:22, AllenJB gentoo-li...@allenjb.me.uk wrote:
The current system caters perfectly for both people who want to avoid
specific toolkits and those who don't care what toolkits they use.
I agree. The current system is best, in my opinion.
Cheers,
--
Ben de Groot
Gentoo Linux
# Daniel Pielmeier bil...@gentoo.org (08 Feb 2010)
# Masked for removal on 10 Mar 2010.
# Manifest failures due to upstream source changes without version bump.
# SRC_URI changes all the time. Firmware extraction fails. Overly complex
# ebuild for just installing one or two files.
# Will be
On 02/08/2010 05:22 PM, AllenJB wrote:
On 08/02/10 14:02, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 02/08/2010 03:41 PM, AllenJB wrote:
On 08/02/10 12:32, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 02/08/2010 01:39 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
IMHO. USE=X is for controlling X.org dependencies, not for avoiding
everything
On 02/07/10 09:38, Markos Chandras wrote:
On Saturday 06 February 2010 19:22:47 Samuli Suominen wrote:
While we have few devs listed in desktop-misc, nobody is really looking
at the bugs in general so it's like a clone of maintainer-needed alias
at the moment... The bug count has escalated in
I was thinking that maybe we should join the desktop-wm [1] and
desktop-util [2] subprojects and elect one lead, as all herds under
these projects seem to lack manpower and coordination. And we could
try to recruit a few new devs for these herds as well. As I am now a
full-time openbox user, I am
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Daniel Pielmeier bil...@gentoo.org wrote:
# Daniel Pielmeier bil...@gentoo.org (08 Feb 2010)
# Masked for removal on 10 Mar 2010.
# Manifest failures due to upstream source changes without version bump.
# SRC_URI changes all the time. Firmware extraction fails.
28 matches
Mail list logo
