Re: [gentoo-dev] Add LDFLAGS=-Wl,--hash-style=gnu to developer profile's make.defaults

2010-03-21 Thread Doktor Notor
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:52:36 -0400 Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: remind me again why this matters ? binutils has been defaulting to hash- style=both for quite a while now. -mike Well, I already tried in my P.S. but let me try again: I'm not suggesting that devs should have more

[gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-x86 commit in media-gfx/graphicsmagick: ChangeLog graphicsmagick-1.3.12.ebuild

2010-03-21 Thread Torsten Veller
* Fabian Groffen (grobian) grob...@gentoo.org: grobian 10/03/21 09:24:54 Modified: ChangeLog graphicsmagick-1.3.12.ebuild Log: Add EPREFIX to configure arguments, bump to EAPI=3 (Portage version: 2.2.00.15838-prefix/cvs/Darwin powerpc) file :

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-x86 commit in media-gfx/graphicsmagick: ChangeLog graphicsmagick-1.3.12.ebuild

2010-03-21 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 21-03-2010 10:35:29 +0100, Torsten Veller wrote: -EAPI=2 +EAPI=3 inherit eutils toolchain-funcs flag-o-matic perl-module perl-module.eclass currently does not support EAPI=3. ohw, I see, that's unfortunate. I'll open a bug. Thanks. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different

[gentoo-dev] Empty herd: sgml

2010-03-21 Thread Thomas Sachau
I see, that the sgml herd seems to be empty for a longer time, so i would like to ask, if someone wants to take that herd and the related ebuilds and bugs over or if we should delete that herd and assign related ebuilds/bugs to m-n. -- Thomas Sachau Gentoo Linux Developer signature.asc

Re: [gentoo-dev] Add LDFLAGS=-Wl,--hash-style=gnu to developer profile's make.defaults

2010-03-21 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 21 March 2010 02:15:17 Doktor Notor wrote: On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:52:36 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: remind me again why this matters ? binutils has been defaulting to hash- style=both for quite a while now. Well, I already tried in my P.S. but let me try again: I'm not

Re: [gentoo-dev] Empty herd: sgml

2010-03-21 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 21 March 2010 08:41:15 Thomas Sachau wrote: I see, that the sgml herd seems to be empty for a longer time, so i would like to ask, if someone wants to take that herd and the related ebuilds and bugs over or if we should delete that herd and assign related ebuilds/bugs to m-n. if

Re: [gentoo-dev] Add LDFLAGS=-Wl,--hash-style=gnu to developer profile's make.defaults

2010-03-21 Thread Doktor Notor
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:04:01 -0400 Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: forcing gnu-only hashes breaks some systems, and is a relatively newish flag, so it isnt a candidate for global enabling. -mike Well... am I really so difficult to understand? I do *NOT* want it globally enabled... I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Add LDFLAGS=-Wl,--hash-style=gnu to developer profile's make.defaults

2010-03-21 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 21 March 2010 13:13:12 Doktor Notor wrote: On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:04:01 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: forcing gnu-only hashes breaks some systems, and is a relatively newish flag, so it isnt a candidate for global enabling. -mike Well... am I really so difficult to understand?

[gentoo-dev] Updating project pages to remove retired developers

2010-03-21 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
Hello. I've just committed an update to the project pages to remove retired developers (I left alone historical pages such as gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en/userrel/soc/archives/). The diff is attached to this email so project members can check it. As I'm not a member of the cvstrans group (thanks

Re: [gentoo-dev] Add LDFLAGS=-Wl,--hash-style=gnu to developer profile's make.defaults

2010-03-21 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 03/21/2010 07:04 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: You *only* get the following QA notice w/ LDFLAGS=-Wl,--hash-style=gnu set: forcing gnu-only hashes breaks some systems, and is a relatively newish flag, so it isnt a candidate for global enabling. -mike The developer profile target is being

Re: [gentoo-dev] Add LDFLAGS=-Wl,--hash-style=gnu to developer profile's make.defaults

2010-03-21 Thread justin
On 21/03/10 18:13, Doktor Notor wrote: On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:04:01 -0400 Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: forcing gnu-only hashes breaks some systems, and is a relatively newish flag, so it isnt a candidate for global enabling. -mike Well... am I really so difficult to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Add LDFLAGS=-Wl,--hash-style=gnu to developer profile's make.defaults

2010-03-21 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 21 March 2010 13:29:50 Samuli Suominen wrote: On 03/21/2010 07:04 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: You *only* get the following QA notice w/ LDFLAGS=-Wl,--hash-style=gnu set: forcing gnu-only hashes breaks some systems, and is a relatively newish flag, so it isnt a candidate for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Add LDFLAGS=-Wl,--hash-style=gnu to developer profile's make.defaults

2010-03-21 Thread Doktor Notor
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:28:18 +0100 justin j...@gentoo.org wrote: I am probably the only one, but I really don't like the way you are talking! Please change that, otherwise I feel to do something against it! Having good ideas or pointing out correct things, doesn't give anybody the right to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Add LDFLAGS=-Wl,--hash-style=gnu to developer profile's make.defaults

2010-03-21 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 03/21/2010 07:41 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Sunday 21 March 2010 13:29:50 Samuli Suominen wrote: On 03/21/2010 07:04 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: You *only* get the following QA notice w/ LDFLAGS=-Wl,--hash-style=gnu set: forcing gnu-only hashes breaks some systems, and is a relatively

Re: [gentoo-dev] Updating project pages to remove retired developers

2010-03-21 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
Hello again. On 21-03-2010 16:26, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: Hello. I've just committed an update to the project pages to remove retired developers (I left alone historical pages such as gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en/userrel/soc/archives/). The diff is attached to this email so project

Re: [gentoo-dev] Empty herd: sgml

2010-03-21 Thread Thomas Sachau
Am 21.03.2010 18:06, schrieb Mike Frysinger: On Sunday 21 March 2010 08:41:15 Thomas Sachau wrote: I see, that the sgml herd seems to be empty for a longer time, so i would like to ask, if someone wants to take that herd and the related ebuilds and bugs over or if we should delete that herd

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2010-03-21 23h59 UTC

2010-03-21 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2010-03-21 23h59 UTC. Removals: x11-misc/googleearth2010-03-16 09:20:11 caster dev-tex/mplib 2010-03-16 11:40:04 ssuominen media-sound/cheesetracker

Re: [gentoo-dev] Empty herd: sgml

2010-03-21 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 21-03-2010 11:41, Thomas Sachau wrote: I see, that the sgml herd seems to be empty for a longer time, so i would like to ask, if someone wants to take that herd and the related ebuilds and bugs over or if we should delete that herd and