Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-25 Thread Richard Freeman
On 03/24/2010 11:47 PM, Joshua Saddler wrote: Even then, it'll likely get installed first, as users will probably learn about p.masking it only *after* they install it. I don't have strong feelings on whether having v3 installed by default is a big problem, but the last bit here probably

[gentoo-dev] Re: MinGW for windows - creating dlls

2010-03-25 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 03/17/2010 03:38 PM, Mansour Al Akeel wrote: Hello all, I am not sure if this is the best list to ask, but I will ask here since it's related to development and cross compilation. I have setup a 32 bit chroot environment to be able to cross develop for windows. I followed this guide:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: MinGW for windows - creating dlls

2010-03-25 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 25 March 2010 12:57:21 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 03/17/2010 03:38 PM, Mansour Al Akeel wrote: I am not sure if this is the best list to ask, but I will ask here since it's related to development and cross compilation. I have setup a 32 bit chroot environment to be able to

[gentoo-dev] Re: MinGW for windows - creating dlls

2010-03-25 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 03/25/2010 07:43 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Thursday 25 March 2010 12:57:21 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 03/17/2010 03:38 PM, Mansour Al Akeel wrote: I am not sure if this is the best list to ask, but I will ask here since it's related to development and cross compilation. I have setup a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: MinGW for windows - creating dlls

2010-03-25 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 25 March 2010 13:53:29 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 03/25/2010 07:43 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Thursday 25 March 2010 12:57:21 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 03/17/2010 03:38 PM, Mansour Al Akeel wrote: I am not sure if this is the best list to ask, but I will ask here since

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-25 Thread Roy Bamford
On 2010.03.24 21:12, William Hubbs wrote: On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 09:36:52PM +0100, Ben de Groot wrote: On 24 March 2010 21:25, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: If we make it clear in the news item that python-3 cannot be used as the default python, so if users do not want it

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-25 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-03-25 19:34:24 Roy Bamford napisaƂ(a): On 2010.03.24 21:12, William Hubbs wrote: On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 09:36:52PM +0100, Ben de Groot wrote: On 24 March 2010 21:25, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: If we make it clear in the news item that python-3 cannot be used as the

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2010-03-25 Thread Michal Januszewski
Hi, I have a bunch of packages that I no longer use and have little to no motivation to maintain. I will be replacing myself with maintainer-needed in their metadata.xml in a few days. If you want to take them, feel free to edit metadata.xml directly -- no need to ask for permission :)

[gentoo-dev] fltk version 1.1 is the one to go for

2010-03-25 Thread linux
Hello, I wanted to report that cinepaint (which as of today is not in portage) compiles fine on my gentoo box which has been emerge-synced only yesterday. It uses however not the fltk-2.0 which is emerged by default but the version fltk-1.1.10. On the fltk website they say however that actually

Re: [gentoo-dev] fltk version 1.1 is the one to go for

2010-03-25 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 03/25/2010 11:01 PM, li...@gabriel-striewe.de wrote: Hello, I wanted to report that cinepaint (which as of today is not in portage) compiles fine on my gentoo box which has been emerge-synced only yesterday. It uses however not the fltk-2.0 which is emerged by default but the version

[gentoo-portage-dev] Handling merge issues (on the case of prefix)

2010-03-25 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Hello! As the prefix branch is not the last case where people may run into problems with merging due to the conversion from SVN to Git I feel like writing about it here. In this mail - The problem - Merges in SVN - Merges in Git - Consequences - Dealing with it - The

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Handling merge issues (on the case of prefix)

2010-03-25 Thread Zac Medico
Thanks, I've used your procedure to do that to the 2.1.7 branch and it seems to have worked well (git cherry now gives the expected result): http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=commit;h=797fb70107834d0346e5201b7a9aaa5d36978c81 -- Thanks, Zac