17:34 Betelgeuse robbat2|na: how easy to it to prevent commits to CVS
if the commit message doesn't match a certain pattern?
17:36 @robbat2|na go and checkout the CVSROOT and there should be an
example there
17:37 Betelgeuse robbat2|na: Ok so doable then. Thanks.
What do you think about not
On 24 April 2010 23:10, Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
17:34 Betelgeuse robbat2|na: how easy to it to prevent commits to CVS
if the commit message doesn't match a certain pattern?
17:36 @robbat2|na go and checkout the CVSROOT and there should be an
example there
17:37 Betelgeuse
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:40:54 +0300
Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
17:34 Betelgeuse robbat2|na: how easy to it to prevent commits to
CVS if the commit message doesn't match a certain pattern?
17:36 @robbat2|na go and checkout the CVSROOT and there should be an
example there
17:37
Hello,
I would like to raise a discussion on the topic of the /etc/portage/env
files support hack, implemented in the profile.bashrc file in gx86 base
profile [1].
I am working on the portage-side implementation of the feature and I
would like to avoid double-sourcing of the override files.
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 22:42:58 +0200
Michał Górny gen...@mgorny.alt.pl wrote:
The hack bypasses the whole concept of PM package stabilization - it
'injects' the bash code into every version of Portage, pkgcore
and Paludis (I guess). A code targeted at Portage, I'd add.
Paludis doesn't use bashrc
Am 24.04.2010 13:32, schrieb Gentoo:
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 22:31 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 04/23/2010 05:43 AM, Sebastian Luther wrote:
Someone might come up with some logic to detect new use flags in
*DEPEND, but this looks like a hack to me.
It doesn't seem too bad to me.
It doesn't
On 04/24/2010 11:00 AM, Sebastian Luther wrote:
Am 24.04.2010 13:32, schrieb Gentoo:
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 22:31 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 04/23/2010 05:43 AM, Sebastian Luther wrote:
Someone might come up with some logic to detect new use flags in
*DEPEND, but this looks like a hack to me.
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 11:27:49AM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 04/24/2010 11:00 AM, Sebastian Luther wrote:
Am 24.04.2010 13:32, schrieb Gentoo:
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 22:31 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 04/23/2010 05:43 AM, Sebastian Luther wrote:
Someone might come up with some logic to
On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 20:00 +0200, Sebastian Luther wrote:
Am 24.04.2010 13:32, schrieb Gentoo:
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 22:31 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 04/23/2010 05:43 AM, Sebastian Luther wrote:
Someone might come up with some logic to detect new use flags in
*DEPEND, but this looks
