On 13:49 Sun 16 Jan , Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
People seem to have started using blockers with package moves recently.
For example, if cat/a is being moved to cat/b, people have started
putting !cat/a as a dependency in cat/b. This is bad, for two reasons.
First, you shouldn't have to do
On 01/17/2011 08:10 AM, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 13:49 Sun 16 Jan , Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Does anyone care to justify their block the old name habits?
How about playing nicely with overlays where the moves didn't happen
(yet)?
That seems like a somewhat justifiable use case. If such
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 10:10:54 -0600
Donnie Berkholz dberkh...@gentoo.org wrote:
How about playing nicely with overlays where the moves didn't happen
(yet)?
It doesn't play nicely, though, since the overlay won't be mutually
blocking.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP
I've noticed we have a SECURITY keyword on bugs.gentoo.org, but only 79
bugs have it, and doesn't seem to be actively used, so it seems to only
add confusion.
What do you think about removing it?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 01/17/2011 05:54 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
I've noticed we have a SECURITY keyword on bugs.gentoo.org, but only 79
bugs have it, and doesn't seem to be actively used, so it seems to only
add confusion.
What do you think about removing it?
All 79 bugs would need a fix then. We can't
Bumped to 2.3.0-p20100820.
Sebastian
