Our bug queue has 81 bugs!
If you have some spare time, please help assign/sort a few bugs.
To view the bug queue, click one of the following links:
http: http://bit.ly/bsHeJt
https: http://bit.ly/8Z4xUU
Thanks!
On 1/28/11 10:11 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
So draft we would like to have implemented as Glep update is this diff:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~scarabeus/glep-0048.diff
I'd suggest to split the diff, discussion and voting to make it more
focused:
1) QA team lead, deputy, and accepting new members of
On 1/25/11 1:30 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
QA is not a solution to everything. The problem Tomas is trying to
counter here is the idle/slacking arches. If the arch is active but have some
concerns regarding the stabilization then let the maintainer deal with
it. This is the way we do it now
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2011-01-30 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
app-vim/latexsuite 2011-01-24 06:47:41
radhermit
Additions:
app-vim/vim-latex 2011-01-24
* Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@gmail.com schrieb:
GitHub _used_ to be broken and provide non-stable downloads, but they
have since fixed that and the download of a tag will always have the
same SHA512 digest, so it's just fine.
That's great. How exactly did they do that ?
IIRC one of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/29/2011 08:07 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 28-01-2011 22:11:30 +0100, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
So draft we would like to have implemented as Glep update is this diff:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~scarabeus/glep-0048.diff
Please comment and help us
On 22:11 Fri 28 Jan , Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
first off i would like to apologize for not sending this mail sooner
(helluva week).
So draft we would like to have implemented as Glep update is this diff:
On 14:07 Sat 29 Jan , Fabian Groffen wrote:
Since QA is getting lots of powers these days, I strongly object to
this, see also my comment on becoming a QA member. I suggest the
following:
The QA lead is yearly elected by the whole dev-community (active
developers), same procedure as
Hello,
I decided to start migrating some CVS and SVN repos to git. First I should do
a cleanup though, and see which ones are still active.
1) gentoo-src [1] cvs repo contains a number of projects separated to
directories. Most of them seem really old and inactive. I'd like to point me
out the
On Monday 31 January 2011 04:54:47 Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
Hello,
I decided to start migrating some CVS and SVN repos to git. First I should
do a cleanup though, and see which ones are still active.
1) gentoo-src [1] cvs repo contains a number of projects separated to
directories. Most of
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 21:00:24 -0500
Dane Smith c1p...@gentoo.org wrote:
I whole-heartedly disagree with this. First off, the line in the
sand concept is completely unnecessary in this case. It barely makes
sense when it's used on a massive scale (can't drink until 21 in the
US), and it only
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 20:39:15 -0600
Donnie Berkholz dberkh...@gentoo.org wrote:
We're here to create an awesome source-based distribution, not
pretend we're United Nations and the U.S. government all rolled into
one. =)
I've been observing for a few years now how sometimes a developer leans
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 17:42:19 -0500
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
1. It makes sense that in the event that a Rogue developer is
wreaking havoc on the tree that QA can get infra to suspend their
commit rights. That's safeguarding the tree in the face of imminent
harm. This should
Hi,
El 01/27/11 18:24, Zac Medico escribió:
On 01/27/2011 09:05 AM, Matthew Summers wrote:
Now, as to whether to include the value ESVN_PASSWORD in the ebuild, I would
not do that. Personally, I would setup svn+ssh and use an ssh key to access
the repo. I do this with git using the git
14 matches
Mail list logo
