Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla 4 migration

2011-03-08 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 07-03-2011 17:25:02 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: As outsider, I don't like to accept another certificate thing, just to view a bugtracker. if we're only forcing *login*, then this isnt an issue +1 -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

[gentoo-dev] Eclass review: gnome.org

2011-03-08 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Hi list, here is an updated revision of gnome.org.eclass. Changes are: * eclass documentation * use versionator instead of bash expression (also it worked for years, the change is done for consistency with versionator use case policy) * new eclass variable,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla 4 migration

2011-03-08 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 07:50 Tue 08 Mar , Hans de Graaff wrote: On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 08:13 -0600, Donnie Berkholz wrote: Thanks! One thing I've been very interested about in 3.x and 4.x is API access that's better than screen-scraping. I tried using the python-bugzilla client that accesses Bugzilla

Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla 4 migration

2011-03-08 Thread Michał Górny
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 15:06:25 -0500 Olivier Crête tes...@gentoo.org wrote: On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 20:47 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: Why does everyone assume it needs to be enforced? If user is interested in protecting his/her data, he/she can simply use https://. If he/she is not, there is no

Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla 4 migration

2011-03-08 Thread Antoni Grzymała
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 15:26:34 +0100, MichaÅ‚ Górny wrote: On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 15:06:25 -0500 Olivier Crête tes...@gentoo.org wrote: On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 20:47 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: Why does everyone assume it needs to be enforced? If user is interested in protecting his/her data, he/she

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in x11-libs/libva: ChangeLog libva-1.0.10.ebuild

2011-03-08 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Tuesday, March 08, 2011 09:28:13 AM Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) wrote: scarabeus11/03/08 12:28:13 Modified: ChangeLog Added:libva-1.0.10.ebuild Log: Update to libva shipped by freedesktop. So we do the same as debian or archlinux. Fixes bug #336854.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla 4 migration

2011-03-08 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:41:08 +0200 Antoni Grzymała awa...@chopin.edu.pl wrote: On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 15:26:34 +0100, MichaÅ‚ Górny wrote: On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 15:06:25 -0500 Olivier Crête tes...@gentoo.org wrote: On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 20:47 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: Why does everyone

Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla 4 migration

2011-03-08 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 03:53:01PM +0100, Micha?? G??rny wrote: On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:41:08 +0200 Antoni Grzyma??a awa...@chopin.edu.pl wrote: On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 15:26:34 +0100, Micha? Grny wrote: On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 15:06:25 -0500 Olivier Cr??te tes...@gentoo.org wrote:

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in x11-libs/libva: ChangeLog libva-1.0.10.ebuild

2011-03-08 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dne 8.3.2011 15:51, Alexis Ballier napsal(a): On Tuesday, March 08, 2011 09:28:13 AM Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) wrote: scarabeus11/03/08 12:28:13 Modified: ChangeLog Added:libva-1.0.10.ebuild Log: Update

[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Re: Patch problem

2011-03-08 Thread Michael
Zac Medico wrote: Inside depgraph._resolve(), it returns False if self._dynamic_config._needed_use_config_changes is non-empty. You want to add an option that causes it to return True instead. Also, you'll need to propagate these changes to the config.setcpv() method somehow, so that the

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Re: Patch problem

2011-03-08 Thread Zac Medico
On 03/08/2011 05:41 AM, Michael wrote: I've been able to collect the list of flags required to satisfy the dependency and apply them, but I'm having difficulty with ensuring that they do not override the user's settings. eg. need +foo to satisfy the dependency, but do not do it it