[gentoo-dev] Re: Disabling locale at emerge output

2011-04-27 Thread Ryan Hill
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 18:26:02 +0200 Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 02:47:46 -0600 > Ryan Hill wrote: > > > > Are you saying you are setting up the tree-wide project that > > > automatically translates LC_MESSAGES? Round of applause! > > > > Nope, but I am raising donations to fund

Re: [gentoo-dev] Camellia?

2011-04-27 Thread Eray Aslan
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 03:38:16PM -0400, James Cloos wrote: > Is there any specific reason why smtp.gentoo and pigeon.gentoo use > camellia for their outbound smtp starttls connections? Probably it is the strongest cipher supported. One can do $ openssl ciphers -v 'ALL:@STRENGTH' on those mach

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Disabling locale at emerge output

2011-04-27 Thread ross smith
2011/4/27 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn > Jeroen Roovers schrieb: > > Look here, I am even willing to argue on your side just to possibly > > extract a meaningful objection to fixing LC_MESSAGES in > > sys-apps/portage. > > I now tend to agree that LC_MESSAGES should be set to C by default. > Howe

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Disabling locale at emerge output

2011-04-27 Thread Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
Jeroen Roovers schrieb: > Look here, I am even willing to argue on your side just to possibly > extract a meaningful objection to fixing LC_MESSAGES in > sys-apps/portage. I now tend to agree that LC_MESSAGES should be set to C by default. However I suggest to put it in the default make.conf, toge

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-pms] Clarify wording on self-blockers

2011-04-27 Thread Maciej Mrozowski
On Wednesday 27 of April 2011 23:30:22 Maciej Mrozowski wrote: Please ignore me, unintentional cross-post. -- regards MM signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-pms] Clarify wording on self-blockers

2011-04-27 Thread Maciej Mrozowski
On Wednesday 27 of April 2011 21:24:51 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > Uh, no, that's the entire point of EAPIs. > > > > This is a common misconception. > > Uh, no. You are completely and horribly wrong. > EAPIs were introduced to avoid the problems that we used to have where > different versions

[gentoo-dev] Camellia?

2011-04-27 Thread James Cloos
Is there any specific reason why smtp.gentoo and pigeon.gentoo use camellia for their outbound smtp starttls connections? Not complaining or anything. Just curious. -JimC -- James Cloos OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: euscan proof of concept (like debian's uscan)

2011-04-27 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dne 27.4.2011 10:04, Corentin Chary napsal(a): > I updated http://euscan.iksaif.net yesterday. > > I also added some overlays, and I now use local portage portage trees > instead of system trees (a script to do that is available in > euscanwww/script)

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Disabling locale at emerge output

2011-04-27 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 02:47:46 -0600 Ryan Hill wrote: > > Are you saying you are setting up the tree-wide project that > > automatically translates LC_MESSAGES? Round of applause! > > Nope, but I am raising donations to fund an instructive manual on the > usage of the NEEDINFO resolution. As alre

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: 24 hour review for >= dev-libs/glib-2.28 stable news item

2011-04-27 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 04/27/2011 11:13 AM, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > On 15:05 Wed 27 Apr , Samuli Suominen wrote: >> The way of setting default URI handlers has changed since >> dev-libs/glib-2.28 and above. If you used the GConf registry to set >> them before, they will now be ignored. > > Do you think all our

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: 24 hour review for >= dev-libs/glib-2.28 stable news item

2011-04-27 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 15:05 Wed 27 Apr , Samuli Suominen wrote: > The way of setting default URI handlers has changed since > dev-libs/glib-2.28 and above. If you used the GConf registry to set > them before, they will now be ignored. Do you think all our users will even understand what this means? Can you pr

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: 24 hour review for >= dev-libs/glib-2.28 stable news item

2011-04-27 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 04/27/2011 03:46 PM, Duncan wrote: > [ .. ] Just to make it clear: The only relationship this news item has to the security bump is the fact that the unvulnerable polkit is just needing newer glib as a dependency for other reasons

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: 24 hour review for >= dev-libs/glib-2.28 stable news item

2011-04-27 Thread Duncan
Samuli Suominen posted on Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:17:57 +0300 as excerpted: > On 04/27/2011 10:46 AM, Duncan wrote: >> Samuli Suominen posted on Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:56:06 +0300 as excerpted: >> >>> You have 24 hours to comment on this news item. Sorry to put it so >>> bluntly but this is required fo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: 24 hour review for >= dev-libs/glib-2.28 stable news item

2011-04-27 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 04/27/2011 10:46 AM, Duncan wrote: > Samuli Suominen posted on Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:56:06 +0300 as excerpted: > >> You have 24 hours to comment on this news item. Sorry to put it so >> bluntly but this is required for major security bug (#364973). >> >> See attachment. >> Title: Upgrade to GLIB

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: 24 hour review for >= dev-libs/glib-2.28 stable news item

2011-04-27 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 04/26/2011 09:56 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > You have 24 hours to comment on this news item. Sorry to put it so > bluntly but this is required for major security bug (#364973). > > See attachment. Based on some comments posted here, and IRC, here is an updated news item. Title: Upgrade to G

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-admin/gentoo-rsync-mirror: metadata.xml ChangeLog

2011-04-27 Thread Dane Smith
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/27/2011 12:01 AM, Jeremy Olexa wrote: > On 04/26/2011 07:17 PM, Dane Smith (c1pher) wrote: >> c1pher 11/04/27 00:17:00 >> >>Modified: metadata.xml ChangeLog >>Log: >>app-admin/gentoo-rsync-mirror: Updated maintainer i

[gentoo-dev] Re: Disabling locale at emerge output

2011-04-27 Thread Ryan Hill
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 06:02:37 +0200 Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 20:05:03 -0600 > Ryan Hill wrote: > > > You want to force English on all our users because you can't be > > bothered to ask a reporter to repost an error message using LC_ALL=C? > > Are you saying you are setting up

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: euscan proof of concept (like debian's uscan)

2011-04-27 Thread Corentin Chary
I updated http://euscan.iksaif.net yesterday. I also added some overlays, and I now use local portage portage trees instead of system trees (a script to do that is available in euscanwww/script). New features: - Handle overlays correctly (special column for overlays) - Add some charts (small bar

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: 24 hour review for >= dev-libs/glib-2.28 stable news item

2011-04-27 Thread Duncan
Samuli Suominen posted on Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:56:06 +0300 as excerpted: > You have 24 hours to comment on this news item. Sorry to put it so > bluntly but this is required for major security bug (#364973). > > See attachment. > Title: Upgrade to GLIB 2.28 Author: GNOME Team > Content-Type: text