On Tue, 31 May 2011 11:00:27 +0100
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 30/05/2011 12:39 μμ, Jeroen Roovers (jer) wrote:
jer 11/05/30 11:39:21
Removed: acct.initd-r1 acct.logrotate-r1
Log:
Move to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 31/05/2011 02:28 μμ, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Tue, 31 May 2011 11:00:27 +0100
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 30/05/2011 12:39 μμ, Jeroen Roovers (jer) wrote:
jer
On Tue, 31 May 2011 15:28:12 +0200
Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, 31 May 2011 11:00:27 +0100
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 30/05/2011 12:39 μμ, Jeroen Roovers (jer) wrote:
jer 11/05/30 11:39:21
On 31/05/11 15:28, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Tue, 31 May 2011 11:00:27 +0100
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 30/05/2011 12:39 μμ, Jeroen Roovers (jer) wrote:
jer 11/05/30 11:39:21
Removed: acct.initd-r1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 31/05/2011 02:32 μμ, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Tue, 31 May 2011 15:28:12 +0200
Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, 31 May 2011 11:00:27 +0100
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash:
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org said:
On 31/05/2011 02:28 μμ, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Tue, 31 May 2011 11:00:27 +0100
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 30/05/2011 12:39 μμ, Jeroen Roovers (jer) wrote:
jer
On Tue, 31 May 2011 15:33:22 +0200
Krzysztof Pawlik nelch...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 31/05/11 15:28, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Tue, 31 May 2011 11:00:27 +0100
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 30/05/2011 12:39 μμ, Jeroen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 31/05/2011 02:38 ??, Mark Loeser wrote:
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org said:
On 31/05/2011 02:28 ??, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Tue, 31 May 2011 11:00:27 +0100
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Tue, 31 May 2011 14:41:20 +0100
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
I assume my e-mail filters to this specific folder are not working
properly
I have no idea what that means.
Anyway, the problem was that xmw found a problem in the Manifest(1)
file and fixed it by editing it
Hello all,
As I suggested earlier, I'm attaching an example implementation
of github-snapshot.eclass.
All the eclass does is providing a default src_unpack() unpacking
the github snapshot into ${S}. Right now it simply does call default
src_unpack() and then does a fuzzy `mv' but that can change
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/31/11 15:29, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 31/05/2011 02:28 ¼¼, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Tue, 31 May 2011 11:00:27 +0100
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
I've noticed you did not update the ChangeLog in this commit. The new
policy[1]
Hi,
If you use this eclass, how should your ebuild specify the commit you
want to take the snapshot from? Your example doesn't show how to do
that.
William
pgpmaKTWUJ4tm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Il giorno mar, 31/05/2011 alle 16.24 +0200, Michał Górny ha scritto:
The eclass doesn't modify S or SRC_URI itself. An ebuild using it
should look like the following:
I have some doubts about using the unbound mv there tbh.
What happens if I need GitHub snapshots from two separate projects?
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hello all,
As I suggested earlier, I'm attaching an example implementation
of github-snapshot.eclass.
case ${EAPI:-0} in
0|1) die EAPI ${EAPI} unsupported.;;
2|3|4) ;;
*) die
On Tue, 31 May 2011 15:07:17 -0400
Mike Gilbert floppymas...@gmail.com wrote:
case ${EAPI:-0} in
0|1) die EAPI ${EAPI} unsupported.;;
2|3|4) ;;
*) die github-snapshot.eclass API in EAPI ${EAPI} not yet
established. esac
Why are EAPI 0 and 1 unsupported? I don't see
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 04:24:23PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
EAPI=4
inherit github-snapshot
DESCRIPTION=Random github package
HOMEPAGE=https://github.com/foo/bar;
bar is actually ${PN}.
SRC_URI=http://github.com/foo/${PN}/tarball/${P} - ${P}.tar.gz
The first ${P} above isn't right,
On Tue, 31 May 2011 14:28:00 -0500
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 04:24:23PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
EAPI=4
inherit github-snapshot
DESCRIPTION=Random github package
HOMEPAGE=https://github.com/foo/bar;
bar is actually ${PN}.
AFAIK it is a
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 04:24:23PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello all,
As I suggested earlier, I'm attaching an example implementation
of github-snapshot.eclass.
All the eclass does is providing a default src_unpack() unpacking
the github snapshot into ${S}. Right now it simply does
On Tue, 31 May 2011 13:40:42 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
A function to generate a github url for SRC_URI is likely warranted;
should they ever grow mirrors/change their scheme, we can change it
in one spot.
Plus it makes it easier for ebuild devs to specify the url ;)
I
hi I just wanted to share this opportunity with you, I've been making 200-300
dollars a day and I started only a week ago. Check out this news article and it
will show you how to get started, it's definitely easy enough for you :)!
http://g.msn.com.br/BR9/1369.0?http://news7cnbc.com/money
20 matches
Mail list logo
