Re: [gentoo-dev] About suggesting to create a separate partition for portage tree in handbook

2012-04-01 Thread Pacho Ramos
El sáb, 31-03-2012 a las 19:25 -0400, Walter Dnes escribió: On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 10:42:50AM -0700, Zac Medico wrote On 03/31/2012 06:34 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: About the wiki page, I can only document reiserfs+tail usage as it's the one I use and I know, about other alternatives like

Re: [gentoo-dev] Should ${T} be defined in pkg_prepare ?

2012-04-01 Thread Ulrich Mueller
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Zac Medico wrote: The problem is that apart from T (and maybe HOME), there seems to be no other directory that check_reqs.eclass could use for its disk space check in pkg_pretend. WORKDIR doesn't exist in pkg_* phases. How about PWD? No sure. Do all package managers

[gentoo-dev] Re: About suggesting to create a separate partition for portage tree in handbook

2012-04-01 Thread Steven J Long
Walter Dnes wrote: I've also cobbled together my own autodepclean script that check for, and optionally unmerges unneeded stuff that was pulled in as a dependancy of a package that has since been removed. What advantage does it have over a standard --depclean? -- #friendly-coders -- We're

[gentoo-dev] Re: Happy 10th birthday (in advance)

2012-04-01 Thread Steven J Long
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: No, what I actually say is *why* things don't work, and if it hasn't already been explained, I say how to fix it. Oh? Where on Earth did you do that in this thread? All you've said so far is that preserve-libs is an awful hack that doesn't really work, is conceptually

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Happy 10th birthday (in advance)

2012-04-01 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 17:04:11 +0100 Steven J Long sl...@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk wrote: Yes, it is hard to admit one has problems; how are things going with your human interaction problems? (They don't seem to be going that well, given your continued attitude.) I mean, you have admitted to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Happy 10th birthday (in advance)

2012-04-01 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 17:04:11 +0100 Steven J Long sl...@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk wrote: Ciaran McCreesh wrote: No, what I actually say is *why* things don't work, and if it hasn't already been explained, I say how to fix it. Oh? Where on Earth did you do that in this thread? All you've said so

Re: [gentoo-dev] Happy 10th birthday (in advance)

2012-04-01 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 19:25:58 +0200 Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote: No, that's what you see from the inside. We, outside your head, the others, see it precisely as Brian worded it. Some people apparently tolerate or even appreciate your general (online) attitude towards humans, but most

Re: [gentoo-dev] Should ${T} be defined in pkg_prepare ?

2012-04-01 Thread Zac Medico
On 04/01/2012 01:29 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Zac Medico wrote: The problem is that apart from T (and maybe HOME), there seems to be no other directory that check_reqs.eclass could use for its disk space check in pkg_pretend. WORKDIR doesn't exist in pkg_* phases. How

Re: [gentoo-dev] Should ${T} be defined in pkg_prepare ?

2012-04-01 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 14:10:50 +0200 Maciej Grela maciej.gr...@gmail.com wrote: I've read the PMS and I haven't found information whether this variable is supposed to be set during pkg_prepare or not. Therefore I ask, what is the proper behaviour here ? Is there documentation on what special env

Re: [gentoo-dev] Should ${T} be defined in pkg_prepare ?

2012-04-01 Thread Maciej Grela
On 01.04.2012 20:55, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 14:10:50 +0200 Maciej Grela maciej.gr...@gmail.com wrote: I've read the PMS and I haven't found information whether this variable is supposed to be set during pkg_prepare or not. Therefore I ask, what is the proper behaviour here

Re: [gentoo-dev] Should ${T} be defined in pkg_prepare ?

2012-04-01 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 19:55:44 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote: On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 14:10:50 +0200 Maciej Grela maciej.gr...@gmail.com wrote: I've read the PMS and I haven't found information whether this variable is supposed to be set during pkg_prepare or not.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Should ${T} be defined in pkg_prepare ?

2012-04-01 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 22:47:23 +0200 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: There's no guarantee, of course, that the amount of space in ${T} in pkg_pretend is anything like the amount of space that will be available for the build, but check-reqs is deliberately designed to be wildly

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2012-04-01 23h59 UTC

2012-04-01 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2012-04-01 23h59 UTC. Removals: dev-db/pgaccess 2012-03-28 13:58:18 titanofold www-client/arora2012-03-28 17:03:20 pesa

Re: [gentoo-dev] Arbitrary breakage: sys-fs/cryptsetup

2012-04-01 Thread schism
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:58:17AM +0200, Sebastian Pipping wrote: | With that bug fixed by now is there still need for a news entry? I don't think I make that call, but if the current plastering-over would generally keep existing setups from breaking, I'm happier.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About suggesting to create a separate partition for portage tree in handbook

2012-04-01 Thread Walter Dnes
On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 04:28:15PM +0100, Steven J Long wrote Walter Dnes wrote: I've also cobbled together my own autodepclean script that check for, and optionally unmerges unneeded stuff that was pulled in as a dependancy of a package that has since been removed. What advantage does