On 2012-08-17, at 11:00 PM, "Gregory M. Turner" wrote:
> It has come to my attention that gentoo supports "relative" ROOT, which is to
> say that, by design, portage will act as though (in bash terms):
>
> ROOT
>
> equals
>
> "${PWD}/${ROOT}"
>
> when (again in bash terms):
>
> [[ $ROOT
On 8/16/2012 6:26 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
The limited-visibility build feature discussed a week or so ago would
go a long way in detecting unexpressed build dependencies.
[snip]
If portage has the
dependency tree in RAM then you just need
On Sat, 18 Aug 2012 12:00:17 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> *yawn* such a drama queen.
>
> i never said "i am going to do this everyone else be damned". i did
> say "i will probably do this soon". but that is why i posted to
> gentoo-dev in the first place -- to get feedback from others.
>
> g
*yawn* such a drama queen.
i never said "i am going to do this everyone else be damned". i did say "i
will probably do this soon". but that is why i posted to gentoo-dev in the
first place -- to get feedback from others.
gnutls breakage: not relevant. you're causing that breakage by not addi
On 18/08/12 18:42, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 18 August 2012 02:01:12 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
there's a trivial patch needed to make 1.49 work. forcing people to use
1.50 is purely the boost's maintainers choice.
[...]
there
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> yes, the patch here is trivial. it removes 1 line of unused code and has
> fixed
> a lot of other packages. deflecting the argument to a flawed system of your
> own
> creation doesn't change it. if you're worried about gnutls breakage,
On Saturday 18 August 2012 03:21:20 Michał Górny wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 23:25:10 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Thursday 16 August 2012 16:19:44 Michał Górny wrote:
> > > --- a/eutils.eclass
> > > +++ b/eutils.eclass
> > >
> > > +# Install all specified s into . This doesn't
> > > modify
On Saturday 18 August 2012 02:01:12 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > there's a trivial patch needed to make 1.49 work. forcing people to use
> > 1.50 is purely the boost's maintainers choice.
>
> [...]
>
> > there's a trivial patch long bee
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 23:25:10 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 16 August 2012 16:19:44 Michał Górny wrote:
> > --- a/eutils.eclass
> > +++ b/eutils.eclass
> >
> > +# Install all specified s into . This doesn't
> > modify global +# 'insinto' path. Alike doins, calls 'die' on
> > failure i
