On 1 October 2013 04:52, Martin Vaeth wrote:
>
> For instance, if you have your home-brewn version of program X,
> you can just install the version under its own package name Y and
> make it satisfy all dependencies of X.
> (Currently you have to mess around with package.provided which has
> many
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 12:58 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>
> Agreed. I was always told that it is up to the arch teams to test the
> reverse deps.
While I think this makes the most sense in general, I think
maintainers do have a role.
If some package has 75 reverse dependencies, and 1 of them tend
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 12:40:04AM +0200, Thomas Kahle wrote:
> On 09/29/2013 11:41 PM, hasufell wrote:
> > It seems this happens more frequently these days, so I'd like to
> > remind people to check stable reverse deps before stabilizing a
> > library, especially when this is a non-maintainer stab
I just saw this today, because the original msg went to another mailbox,
but the reply showed up here on -dev.
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 08:39:06AM -0400, Douglas Freed wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Dnia 2013-09-13, o godz. 19:16:06
> > William Hubbs napisał(a):
On 09/30/2013 11:44 AM, hasufell wrote:
> On 09/30/2013 09:22 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 09/29/2013 10:41 PM, hasufell wrote:
>>> Arch teams do not test them, so this is the business of the
>>> maintainer or the dev who requested stabilization.
>>>
>
>> That is definitely not true. We always
On 09/30/2013 07:45 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> hasufell schrieb:
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464536
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=470554
>>
>> for the first bug:
>> net-libs/ortp media-libs/mediastreamer and net-voip/linphone
>> are from the same upstream
Kent Fredric wrote:
>>
>> > The best solution I presently have for this problem, would be to have
>> > a PROVIDES-${PV}.json file in every package under files/
>>
>> Not under files but in the eclass, and the rest of the
>> work is done by the perl-dep function.
>
> The reason I suggested that app
On 9/30/13 3:44 AM, hasufell wrote:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=470554
> [...]
> for the second bug:
> we now have a stable net-libs/libosip that cannot be installed when
> you want to install stable net-libs/libeXosip... that is not a good
> spot. Those libraries again should have be
On 9/30/13 1:31 AM, hero...@gentoo.org wrote:
> Having a unstable eclass as toolchain-r1.eclass in tree might not be a
> good idea compared to an overlay though.
If that's the case, it should be pretty straightforward to create an
overlay with that eclass, either under toolchain-r1 or just
toolcha
On 9/29/13 11:14 PM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> If you look at the policy, it says to test few rdeps.
And I think this is right. If you'd like things to be done in a
different way, discussing them is OK, but "unilaterally" just skipping
that is not OK.
> The arch tester is in charge to test the pa
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2013-09-13, o godz. 19:16:06
> William Hubbs napisał(a):
>
>> OpenRC currently has a public api, consisting of librc and libeinfo
>> (rc.h and einfo.h are the headers); however, I do not know of any
>> released software that uses these,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/30/2013 01:45 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> hasufell schrieb:
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464536
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=470554
>>
>> for the first bug: net-libs/ortp media-libs/mediastreamer and
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/17/2013 09:05 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:58:20 -0400 Michael Mol
> wrote:
>> On 4/17/2013 2:48 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>>> On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:33:29 -0400 Mike Frysinger
>>> wrote:
but i'm super lazy, so even
hasufell schrieb:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464536
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=470554
>
> for the first bug:
> net-libs/ortp media-libs/mediastreamer and net-voip/linphone
> are from the same upstream and actually have to be bumped and
> stabilized TOGETHER, because it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/30/2013 09:22 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 09/29/2013 10:41 PM, hasufell wrote:
>> Arch teams do not test them, so this is the business of the
>> maintainer or the dev who requested stabilization.
>>
>
> That is definitely not true. We alway
"Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina" writes:
> While I'm not nearly good enough to detail how this should happen
> exactly, please, may I beg, do an eclass revision for this.
There is an r1 candidate as Paweł initiated (bug 474358)
> The fact that this hasn't been done clearly implies it is a lot of
On 09/29/2013 10:41 PM, hasufell wrote:
> Arch teams do not test them, so this is the business of the maintainer
> or the dev who requested stabilization.
>
That is definitely not true. We always trained Arch Testers to test
reverse dependencies as well.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Lin
17 matches
Mail list logo
