On 12/05/14 02:18, Davide Pesavento wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 11:42 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi, everyone.
Almost 9 months ago I've committed three new FEATURES for portage:
cgroup, ipc-sandbox and network-sandbox. Today I'd like to propose
enabling at least the latter
On Sun, 11 May 2014 23:42:38 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi, everyone.
Almost 9 months ago I've committed three new FEATURES for portage:
cgroup, ipc-sandbox and network-sandbox. Today I'd like to propose
enabling at least the latter two by default.
Firstly, I'd like to
W dniu 11.05.2014 23:27, Pacho Ramos pisze:
El dom, 11-05-2014 a las 19:46 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
Hello, developers.
I'd like to raise the following item for discussion: making .xz
the default compressor used by portage for documentation, man pages
and info files. That is, the
On Sun, 11 May 2014 19:46:50 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Rationale: xz-utils is quite widespread nowadays and it is a part
of @system set. It can achieve better compression ratio than bzip2,
and faster decompression at the same time.
Some thoughts:
What about putting multiple
On Mon, 12 May 2014 00:47:17 -0600
Ryan Hill rh...@gentoo.org wrote:
1. cgroup -- puts all processes spawned by ebuild to cgroup, and
kills all of them once phase exits (prevents leaving orphans),
2. ipc-sandbox -- puts all processes spawned by ebuild to a separate
IPC namespace,
On Mon, 12 May 2014 11:31:45 +0200
Marcin Mirosław mar...@mejor.pl wrote:
Imho there is no real advantages to change current compressor for man
files.
It's insufficient to experiment on a single file to make such claim,
you may very well found a file that works equally well with multiple
В Sun, 11 May 2014 18:26:32 -0500
Gordon Pettey petteyg...@gmail.com пишет:
A lot of small files (e.g. AUTHORS, ChangeLog
FWIW: On my system, I have 59M of bz2 files in /usr/share/man and
/usr/share/doc. A short script to decompress those and recompress with xz
-6e reduced that to 36M.
В Mon, 12 May 2014 14:47:36 +0400
Alexander Tsoy alexan...@tsoy.me пишет:
В Sun, 11 May 2014 18:26:32 -0500
Gordon Pettey petteyg...@gmail.com пишет:
A lot of small files (e.g. AUTHORS, ChangeLog
FWIW: On my system, I have 59M of bz2 files in /usr/share/man and
/usr/share/doc. A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
- -1 from me until Portage is capable of detecting if the user's
operating system supports the FEATUREs, and informing them of this.
I also agree with Ryan that the relevant Linux options should be added
to the Gentoo Linux menu.
- --
Alexander
On Mon, 12 May 2014 14:47:36 +0400
Alexander Tsoy alexan...@tsoy.me wrote:
Here is my test results. xz options: --lzma2=preset=6e,dict=4MiB.
Larger dictionary size does not improve compression ratio, I get
even worse results with just -6e or -9e. man-bz2 is a full copy of
my /usr/share/man,
В Mon, 12 May 2014 14:17:11 +0200
Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org пишет:
On Mon, 12 May 2014 14:47:36 +0400
Alexander Tsoy alexan...@tsoy.me wrote:
Here is my test results. xz options: --lzma2=preset=6e,dict=4MiB.
Larger dictionary size does not improve compression ratio, I get
even worse
Am Montag, 12. Mai 2014, 13:15:35 schrieb Alexander Berntsen:
-1 from me until Portage is capable of detecting if the user's
operating system supports the FEATUREs, and informing them of this.
I also agree with Ryan that the relevant Linux options should be added
to the Gentoo Linux menu.
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Andreas K. Huettel
dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Am Montag, 12. Mai 2014, 13:15:35 schrieb Alexander Berntsen:
-1 from me until Portage is capable of detecting if the user's
operating system supports the FEATUREs, and informing them of this.
I also agree with
On Mon, 12 May 2014 13:15:35 +0200
Alexander Berntsen berna...@gentoo.org wrote:
- -1 from me until Portage is capable of detecting if the user's
operating system supports the FEATUREs, and informing them of this.
A flag being present or not in FEATURES does not mean anything, and if
you're
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/05/14 17:23, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
A flag being present or not in FEATURES does not mean anything, and
if you're assuming that it does then you have a bug.
Please try to stay on topic, and don't obfuscate your posts
needlessly. Note that I
On Mon, 12 May 2014 17:46:57 +0200
Alexander Berntsen berna...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 12/05/14 17:23, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
A flag being present or not in FEATURES does not mean anything, and
if you're assuming that it does then you have a bug.
Please try to stay on topic, and don't obfuscate
On 12/05/14 18:56, Julian Ospald (hasufell) wrote:
hasufell14/05/12 15:56:05
Added:libsdl2-2.0.3-static-libs.patch
Log:
version bump
(Portage version: 2.2.10/cvs/Linux x86_64, signed Manifest commit with key
BDEED020)
Revision ChangesPath
1.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/11/2014 05:42 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Hi, everyone.
Almost 9 months ago I've committed three new FEATURES for portage:
cgroup, ipc-sandbox and network-sandbox. Today I'd like to propose
enabling at least the latter two by default.
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina
zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote:
What about talking to local network resources? In my metasploit ebuild
it has tests available which talk to a local database and are perfectly
safe, however, if postgresql is started on the system the tests
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2014 17:46:57 +0200
Alexander Berntsen berna...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 12/05/14 17:23, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
A flag being present or not in FEATURES does not mean anything, and
if you're
On Mon, 12 May 2014 12:44:38 -0400
Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2014 17:46:57 +0200
Alexander Berntsen berna...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 12/05/14 17:23, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
A
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2014 12:44:38 -0400
Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2014 17:46:57 +0200
Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
Why, though?
We should probably emit an error message advising the user to enable
the kernel option or disable the network-sandbox feature. This should
happen when we call
Dnia 2014-05-12, o godz. 12:40:42
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
However, I don't know if portage actually makes the network namespace
that it creates useful - I don't know if it contains any interfaces,
or if they are initialized/etc.
It sets up a private loopback (alike 'ifconfig
Dnia 2014-05-12, o godz. 12:07:11
Rick \Zero_Chaos\ Farina zeroch...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
What about talking to local network resources? In my metasploit ebuild
it has tests available which talk to a local database and are perfectly
safe, however, if postgresql is started on the system the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/12/2014 01:08 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2014-05-12, o godz. 12:07:11
Rick \Zero_Chaos\ Farina zeroch...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
What about talking to local network resources? In my metasploit ebuild
it has tests available which talk to
Dnia 2014-05-12, o godz. 13:22:20
Rick \Zero_Chaos\ Farina zeroch...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/12/2014 01:08 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2014-05-12, o godz. 12:07:11
Rick \Zero_Chaos\ Farina zeroch...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
What
On Mon, 12 May 2014 18:59:33 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
- $(LIBTOOL) --mode=link $(CC) -o $@ $(OBJECTS)
$(VERSION_OBJECTS) $(LDFLAGS) $(EXTRA_LDFLAGS) $(LT_LDFLAGS)
+ $(LIBTOOL) --mode=link $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o $@ $^ $(LDFLAGS)
$(EXTRA_LDFLAGS) $(LT_LDFLAGS)
Rich Freeman wrote:
Longterm, this makes it year after year more difficult to develop
software for Linux.
I'm with you here, but what is the solution?
If we say we stick to upstream then we don't provide pkg-config files
at all (in these cases).
I think this is a sane default.
Then
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina
zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote:
That would be nice, can we do the network namespaces so that I at least
don't have to bind to a random port? That alone would be a major
improvement in usability.
From my very limited understanding of network
On 12/05/14 20:47, Peter Stuge wrote:
Rich Freeman wrote:
Longterm, this makes it year after year more difficult to develop
software for Linux.
I'm with you here, but what is the solution?
If we say we stick to upstream then we don't provide pkg-config files
at all (in these cases).
I
Dnia 2014-05-12, o godz. 21:24:26
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On 12/05/14 20:47, Peter Stuge wrote:
Rich Freeman wrote:
Longterm, this makes it year after year more difficult to develop
software for Linux.
I'm with you here, but what is the solution?
If we
Samuli Suominen wrote:
If we say we stick to upstream then we don't provide pkg-config files
at all (in these cases).
I think this is a sane default.
Except having pkg-config is the only way to fix some of the build
issues we are seeing today, like getting 'Libs.private: ' for
static
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:48 PM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Samuli Suominen wrote:
If we say we stick to upstream then we don't provide pkg-config files
at all (in these cases).
I think this is a sane default.
Except having pkg-config is the only way to fix some of the build
On Mon, 12 May 2014 20:48:16 +0200
Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Samuli Suominen wrote:
Except having pkg-config is the only way to fix some of the build
issues we are seeing today, like getting 'Libs.private: ' for
static linking, there has been multiple bugs lately,
I honestly
Tom Wijsman wrote:
besides a temporary fix downstream it should go upstream;
I think there is agreement that this is the ideal, and that the
discussion is about what to do when that seems out of reach.
My key point is that it isn't Gentoo's responsibility or duty to fix
problems introduced
On 12/05/14 22:25, Peter Stuge wrote:
(Are we seriously discussing banning something useful as pkg-config
files?! That's retarded. Must be some joke.)
I don't think I said to ban them. I said that I want Gentoo to stay
close to upstream by default. I also said that maintainers shouldn't
be
Samuli Suominen:
You know that adding $(LDFLAGS) so late in the linker line makes whole
-Wl,--as-needed get ignored?
Yes I know and the patch is correct as is.
On 05/12/2014 06:47 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
Rich Freeman wrote:
Longterm, this makes it year after year more difficult to develop
software for Linux.
I'm with you here, but what is the solution?
If we say we stick to upstream then we don't provide pkg-config files
at all (in these cases).
Hi Ben,
On 05/12/2014 07:06 AM, Ben de Groot wrote:
On 12 May 2014 03:28, Jauhien Piatlicki jauh...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi all,
LXQt 0.7.0 has been released [1].
As it is project different from LXDE
That is debatable. LXQt is released by the merged LXDE and Razor-Qt
upstreams. One could
Samuli Suominen:
On 12/05/14 20:47, Peter Stuge wrote:
Rich Freeman wrote:
Longterm, this makes it year after year more difficult to develop
software for Linux.
I'm with you here, but what is the solution?
If we say we stick to upstream then we don't provide pkg-config files
at all (in
On Mon, 12 May 2014 21:25:55 +0200
Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Tom Wijsman wrote:
besides a temporary fix downstream it should go upstream;
I think there is agreement that this is the ideal, and that the
discussion is about what to do when that seems out of reach.
Yes, I think
On Mon, 12 May 2014 23:43:34 +0200
Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
Yeah, it's tricky; this makes me think, can't we perhaps install them
in a separate directory that pkg-config could check?
A quick collective brainstorm on IRC gives the idea that this is not
worth the effort, as this
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 5:47 AM, Alexander Tsoy alexan...@tsoy.me wrote:
В Sun, 11 May 2014 18:26:32 -0500
Gordon Pettey petteyg...@gmail.com пишет:
A lot of small files (e.g. AUTHORS, ChangeLog
FWIW: On my system, I have 59M of bz2 files in /usr/share/man and
/usr/share/doc. A short
On Mon, 12 May 2014 11:39:10 +0200
Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2014 00:47:17 -0600
Ryan Hill rh...@gentoo.org wrote:
1. cgroup -- puts all processes spawned by ebuild to cgroup, and
kills all of them once phase exits (prevents leaving orphans),
2.
Hi,
I do not know if this came up... glibc must be bumped first[1].
Alon
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=504032
On Mon, 12 May 2014 11:35:00 +0200 Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Sun, 11 May 2014 19:46:50 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Rationale: xz-utils is quite widespread nowadays and it is a
part of @system set. It can achieve better compression ratio
than bzip2, and faster decompression at
On 05/12/2014 01:17 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
It's only me who spoke on behalf of LXDE so far :( gtk2 is still
alive, and lxde said that while it's still alive, the GTK lxde will
still be supported. After all, lxde-base, as the name implies, is for
lxde-related packages (maintained by lxde@).
Hello,
On Mon, 12 May 2014 14:47:36 +0400 Alexander Tsoy wrote:
В Sun, 11 May 2014 18:26:32 -0500
Gordon Pettey petteyg...@gmail.com пишет:
A lot of small files (e.g. AUTHORS, ChangeLog
FWIW: On my system, I have 59M of bz2 files in /usr/share/man and
/usr/share/doc. A short script
Hello,
On Sun, 11 May 2014 23:42:38 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
Hi, everyone.
Almost 9 months ago I've committed three new FEATURES for portage:
cgroup, ipc-sandbox and network-sandbox. Today I'd like to propose
enabling at least the latter two by default.
Firstly, I'd like to shortly
On Tue, 13 May 2014, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
Please consider that by default du shows block size, not byte size.
Than means that if file is actually 1234 bytes large, without -b it
will be still accounted for 4096 bytes on 4K-block filesystem.
This raises another question, namely if files
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Thanks! Committed as b4d8e300c04b768be7cd5c64116d6cc0453219b4.
- --
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
And the manpages..?
-A
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 3:14 AM, Alexander Berntsen berna...@gentoo.orgwrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Thanks! Committed as b4d8e300c04b768be7cd5c64116d6cc0453219b4.
- --
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
Am 12.05.2014 12:14, schrieb Alexander Berntsen:
Thanks! Committed as b4d8e300c04b768be7cd5c64116d6cc0453219b4.
This change requires a new profile format (you'd want to call it
portage-3 probably). The change then needs to depend on it.
- Sebastian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Mon, 12 May 2014 12:14:51 +0200
Alexander Berntsen berna...@gentoo.org wrote:
Thanks! Committed as b4d8e300c04b768be7cd5c64116d6cc0453219b4.
- --
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
Did you look at the bug mentioned? It is an EAPI-6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/05/14 20:45, Brian Dolbec wrote:
Did you look at the bug mentioned? It is an EAPI-6 proposal,
which when you look at the PMS patch... it also mentions that
catalyst is not capable of packages.build as a directory. So it
needs to be
Am 12.05.2014 21:43, schrieb Alexander Berntsen:
The patch fixes a more immediate problem. Per the Portage man
page, any file in /etc/portage/make.profile/ can be a directory.
Without this patch, Portage crashes.
Please cite the part of the man page that says this. I only see (in
man
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Mon, 12 May 2014 22:39:19 +0200
Alexander Berntsen berna...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 12/05/14 22:06, Sebastian Luther wrote:
Please cite the part of the man page that says this. I only see
(in man portage): 'Any file in this directory [...]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Mon, 12 May 2014 23:24:40 +0200
Alexander Berntsen berna...@gentoo.org wrote:
FIX IT!
I'm not convinced screaming at volunteers is a good motivational
strategy.
I didn't mean it as a scream, just emphasis. I've been feeling a little
59 matches
Mail list logo
