Martin Vaeth wrote:
The user's vardb could then automatically receive the last state of
the ebuild, before it was removed.
It doesn't help reliably, either, since the last state of the ebuild,
before it was removed, will be outdated at some point, too.
Sorry, I don't see how. Can
On 29 July 2014 19:33, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
I think the vdb can and should be updated according to portage changes.
Someone just needs to code it. ;)
And an appropriate method for doing this must be decided upon.
And that part entails 70% of the discussion dispute :)
--
Kent
Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
This suggests another data model bug to me: that dependencies belong
to the dependent packages, rather than to dependency providers.
Sometimes it is this way, sometimes the opposite.
It would not be natural to associate to a huge library like openssl
the
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 3:33 AM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Rich Freeman wrote:
This is really the crux of these sorts of issues. It doesn't matter
if dependencies are static or dynamic - if you hang onto orphans then
you're going to have cruft in your vdb which is going to lead to
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 23:23:04 -0500
James Potts are...@gmail.com wrote:
Paludis has an elegant solution for this situation (-F/-A), but afaik
portage doesn't.
I'd not call -F / -A elegant... It's a nasty trick that we only added
because || dependencies are such a pain. They shouldn't be
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Alex Xu alex_y...@yahoo.ca wrote:
http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/media-libs/x265/x265-.ebuild?revision=1.9view=markup#l9
Thanks, Alex. This makes more sense now.
Denis.
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
AFAIK, gentoo policy is that live ebuilds should always be masked so as
never to be automatically pulled in without a deliberate unmasking of the
live ebuild, but whether that's masked due to lack of keywords (ebuild),
or due
On 07/26/14 18:01, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 16:29 -0400, Anthony G. Basile escribió:
On 07/26/14 09:44, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 09:37 -0400, Anthony G. Basile escribió:
On 07/26/14 09:28, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 14:55 +0200, Andreas
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
Looks like www-client/chromium is going to start using c++11 seriously
and require gcc-4.8+, see thread
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msg/chromium-packagers/fvJvPG8fa7I/iWPEsUxhKikJ
This is in the dev
2014-07-29 20:28 GMT+04:00 Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org:
A third option that comes from the chromium-packagers ML:
3. Download and use the pre-built clang binaries from the Chromium project.
As a proxy maintainer of a package that also utilizes C++11
extensively in late releases, I'm also
Dnia 2014-07-23, o godz. 19:48:17
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
Looks like www-client/chromium is going to start using c++11 seriously
and require gcc-4.8+, see thread
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msg/chromium-packagers/fvJvPG8fa7I/iWPEsUxhKikJ
This is in
On 29/07/14 03:15, Denis Dupeyron wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:41 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org
wrote:
x265-1.2.ebuild:KEYWORDS=~amd64 ~arm ~x86
x265-1.3.ebuild:KEYWORDS=~amd64 ~x86
x265-.ebuild:KEYWORDS=~amd64 ~x86
As in... You forgot to add ~arm to
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 04:29:51PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 07/26/14 09:44, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 09:37 -0400, Anthony G. Basile escribió:
On 07/26/14 09:28, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 14:55 +0200, Andreas K. Huettel escribió:
Am Samstag,
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 02:46:43PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
Hi everyone,
This is a ppc/ppc64 issues, but I'm sending this to gentoo-dev@ because
it seems to me that those herds are pretty scattered right:
1) The issue came up about restructuring the arch/powerpc profiles.
There
В Sun, 27 Jul 2014 14:42:24 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org пишет:
On 26/07/14 15:49, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:41:16 + (UTC)
Martin Vaeth mar...@mvath.de wrote:
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
Dynamics deps are already broken, not consistently
On 30/07/14 07:45, Alexander Tsoy wrote:
В Sun, 27 Jul 2014 14:42:24 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org пишет:
On 26/07/14 15:49, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:41:16 + (UTC)
Martin Vaeth mar...@mvath.de wrote:
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
Dynamics deps
16 matches
Mail list logo
