On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 07:52:03AM +0800, Patrick Lauer wrote:
On 10/14/14 05:22, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
For compatibility and migration support, we've kept the old OpenLDAP
2.3.x ebuilds in the tree for nearly 5 years.
And you better keep them for a while, because some of us are stuck
On 10/13/2014 12:46 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
Hi,
In order to solve bug #503802 [1], I would like to add a
virtual/podofo-build package to pull in app-text/podofo and
dev-libs/boost. Then packages like app-text/calibre can put
virtual/podofo-build in DEPEND and app-text/podofo in RDEPEND. The
On 13/10/14 03:46 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
Hi,
In order to solve bug #503802 [1], I would like to add a
virtual/podofo-build package to pull in app-text/podofo and
dev-libs/boost. Then packages like app-text/calibre can put
virtual/podofo-build in DEPEND and app-text/podofo in RDEPEND. The
On 10/14/2014 03:56 PM, Alex Xu wrote:
On 13/10/14 03:46 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
Hi,
In order to solve bug #503802 [1], I would like to add a
virtual/podofo-build package to pull in app-text/podofo and
dev-libs/boost. Then packages like app-text/calibre can put
virtual/podofo-build in DEPEND
On 10/13/2014 02:41 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
I agree with Diego and Ralph: Go with d.
repoman will generate a warning (not an error) about a dependency
which does not exist, but this is safe to ignore.
Given that (d) didn't require me to do anything else, I just went ahead
and removed
On 10/14/14 20:25, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 10/13/2014 02:41 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
I agree with Diego and Ralph: Go with d.
repoman will generate a warning (not an error) about a dependency
which does not exist, but this is safe to ignore.
Given that (d) didn't require me to do anything
On Tuesday 14 October 2014 16:02:20 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 07:52:03AM +0800, Patrick Lauer wrote:
On 10/14/14 05:22, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
For compatibility and migration support, we've kept the old OpenLDAP
2.3.x ebuilds in the tree for nearly 5 years.
And
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Alex Xu alex_y...@yahoo.ca wrote:
I feel like there should be a DEPEND specifier for packages required to
build against this package. For example, xproto is required to build
against SDL (at least using pkg-config), but not to simply use it at
runtime. This
On 10/14/2014 06:20 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
So, if the podofo-build virtual listed boost in its RDEPENDs that
would be fine. However, it would seem simpler to me to just list
boost in the calibre DEPENDs.
Yeah, boost in the calibre DEPENDs satisfies my `emerge --depclean
--with-bdeps=n`
On 10/14/2014 06:42 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 10/14/2014 06:20 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
So, if the podofo-build virtual listed boost in its RDEPENDs that
would be fine. However, it would seem simpler to me to just list
boost in the calibre DEPENDs.
Yeah, boost in the calibre DEPENDs
Hi,
As we all know, emerge --search/--searchdesc actions are embarrassingly
slow (from most users' perspectives, anyway), especially in comparison
to external tools like eix and esearch.
Wouldn't it be nice if the performance of emerge's search functionality
was more competitive with other
Zac Medico posted on Tue, 14 Oct 2014 00:40:21 -0700 as excerpted:
I suggest that we add support for a
package description index file format. For example, the attached script
will generate a suitable index formatted as series of lines like this:
On 10/14/2014 02:53 AM, Duncan wrote:
Zac Medico posted on Tue, 14 Oct 2014 00:40:21 -0700 as excerpted:
I suggest that we add support for a
package description index file format. For example, the attached script
will generate a suitable index formatted as series of lines like this:
Zac Medico posted on Tue, 14 Oct 2014 03:05:35 -0700 as excerpted:
On 10/14/2014 02:53 AM, Duncan wrote:
Zac Medico posted on Tue, 14 Oct 2014 00:40:21 -0700 as excerpted:
I suggest that we add support for a
package description index file format.
What about homepage? An index for it
On 10/14/2014 02:53 AM, Duncan wrote:
What about homepage? An index for it too?
If we really want to index the homepage, then a more extensible format
might be better. For example, each line of the index could be a JSON
object like this:
{description: sandbox'd LD_PRELOAD hack, homepage:
Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
If we really want to index the homepage, then a more extensible format
might be better. For example, each line of the index could be a JSON
object like this:
{description: sandbox'd LD_PRELOAD hack, homepage:
On 10/14/2014 09:27 AM, Martin Vaeth wrote:
Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
If we really want to index the homepage, then a more extensible format
might be better. For example, each line of the index could be a JSON
object like this:
{description: sandbox'd LD_PRELOAD hack, homepage:
17 matches
Mail list logo
