RE: [gentoo-dev] Re: bug-wrangling (was: [warning] the bug queue has 111 bugs)

2015-04-18 Thread Franz Fellner
Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 17/04/15 12:13 PM, Franz Fellner wrote: > > Alex Alexander wrote: > >> Our bug queue has 111 bugs! > >> > >> If you have some spare time, please help assign/sort a few bugs. > >> > >> To view the bug queue, click

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-java/classworlds

2015-04-18 Thread James Le Cuirot
# James Le Cuirot (18 Apr 2015) # Old, unmaintained, not used by anything, and superseded by # plexus-classworlds. There is a newer version in java-overlay that # can't go yet but will go eventually. Removal in 30 days. dev-java/classworlds -- James Le Cuirot (chewi) Gentoo Linux Developer pgp

[gentoo-dev] [warning] the bug queue has 131 bugs

2015-04-18 Thread Alex Alexander
Our bug queue has 131 bugs! If you have some spare time, please help assign/sort a few bugs. To view the bug queue, click here: http://bit.ly/m8PQS5 Thanks!

Re: [gentoo-dev] Becoming a Gentoo developer?

2015-04-18 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 9:03 AM, hasufell wrote: > > Having a proper review workflow/platform increases the contribution > factor of the community. And not just that. Define "contribution factor." If you mean the number of people writing patches vs the number of people with commit access, I'll a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Becoming a Gentoo developer?

2015-04-18 Thread hasufell
On 04/18/2015 02:35 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: >> >> I am really confused. I guess some people have never really been in a >> different workflow than gentoo to know that it's really not >> state-of-the-art. And it really isn't. Not even for distros. >> > > I am not saying that a review workflow is ba

Re: [gentoo-dev] Becoming a Gentoo developer?

2015-04-18 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 5:15 AM, hasufell wrote: > On 04/17/2015 07:15 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Alexander Berntsen >> wrote: >>> >>> On 17/04/15 16:33, Andrew Savchenko wrote: The problem is double effort: previously one developer effort was needed, n

Re: [gentoo-dev] Becoming a Gentoo developer?

2015-04-18 Thread hasufell
On 04/17/2015 11:09 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 16. April 2015, 19:27:13 schrieb hasufell: > >> High-quality overlays are the easiest way to contribute. I don't think >> users should really have to care when or how an ebuild reaches the CVS >> gentoo tree. Most projects already

Re: [gentoo-dev] Becoming a Gentoo developer?

2015-04-18 Thread Patrick Lauer
On Saturday 18 April 2015 11:15:56 hasufell wrote: > On 04/17/2015 07:15 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Alexander Berntsen > > > > wrote: > >> On 17/04/15 16:33, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > >>> The problem is double effort: previously one developer effort was > >>> ne

Re: [gentoo-dev] Becoming a Gentoo developer?

2015-04-18 Thread hasufell
On 04/17/2015 07:15 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Alexander Berntsen > wrote: >> >> On 17/04/15 16:33, Andrew Savchenko wrote: >>> The problem is double effort: previously one developer effort was >>> needed, now effort is doubled at least >> You have correctly identi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Becoming a Gentoo developer?

2015-04-18 Thread hasufell
On 04/17/2015 04:33 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:50:00 +0200 hasufell wrote: If you have followed the recent discussions about gentoos organizational structure, review workflow and overlay situation you would know that there is a pretty simple solution for thi