Re: [gentoo-dev] Openstack image availability

2015-06-08 Thread Daniel
you can deploy Openstack on the image, it isn't made for that purpose. Something like this is needed to import it into glance. glance image-create --name gentoo-20150608 --disk-format qcow2 --container-format bare --is-public True --min-disk 5 --min-ram 512 --file gentoo-amd64-multilib_2015-06

Re: [gentoo-dev] Openstack image availability

2015-06-08 Thread Matthew Thode
This is an image to deploy on top of Openstack. While you can deploy Openstack on the image, it isn't made for that purpose. Something like this is needed to import it into glance. glance image-create --name gentoo-20150608 --disk-format qcow2 --container-format bare

Re: [gentoo-dev] Openstack image availability

2015-06-08 Thread wireless
On 06/08/2015 10:30 AM, Matthew Thode wrote: Hi, I've just started generation of Gentoo Openstack images. Right now it is just a basic amd64 image, but I plan on adding nomultilib and hardened variants (for a total of at least 4 images). I plan on generating these images at least weekly.

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Indention in metadata.xml

2015-06-08 Thread William Hubbs
On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 09:26:08AM +0200, Justin Lecher (jlec) wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi everyone, Can we get an agreement on how we are indenting metadata.xml? I like to properly format and indent metadata.xml, but without having an agreement or policy

Re: [gentoo-dev] Openstack image availability

2015-06-08 Thread Matthew Thode
This is an image to deploy on top of Openstack. While you can deploy Openstack on the image, it isn't made for that purpose. Something like this is needed to import it into glance. glance image-create --name gentoo-20150608 --disk-format qcow2 --container-format bare --is-public True --min-disk 5 --min-ram

Re: [gentoo-dev] new eclass: go-live.eclass for handling go live ebuilds

2015-06-08 Thread William Hubbs
All, here is the latest version of this eclass, which I will commit an hour from now if no one has any objections. Thanks, William # Copyright 2015 Gentoo Foundation # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2 # $Header: $ # @ECLASS: golang-vcs.eclass # @MAINTAINER: #

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Indention in metadata.xml

2015-06-08 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2015-06-08, o godz. 08:36:02 Justin (jlec) j...@gentoo.org napisał(a): On 07/06/15 22:22, Michał Górny wrote: Dnia 2015-06-07, o godz. 22:16:18 Justin Lecher (jlec) j...@gentoo.org napisał(a): -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 07/06/15 14:48, Andrew Udvare

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [OT] Re: Re: RFC: Indention in metadata.xml

2015-06-08 Thread Peter Stuge
Duncan wrote: The point you made here was console-based workflow, as quoted above, and that's what I addressed, arguing that even if was valid at some point, it's no longer the factor it once was. For you, that is. Be aware that this creates your bias. You can't extrapolate from your own

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Indention in metadata.xml

2015-06-08 Thread Alec Warner
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 12:26 AM, Justin Lecher (jlec) j...@gentoo.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi everyone, Can we get an agreement on how we are indenting metadata.xml? I like to properly format and indent metadata.xml, but without having an agreement or

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Indention in metadata.xml

2015-06-08 Thread Daniel zlg Campbell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/08/2015 12:47 PM, William Hubbs wrote: On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 09:26:08AM +0200, Justin Lecher (jlec) wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi everyone, Can we get an agreement on how we are indenting metadata.xml?

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [OT] Re: Re: RFC: Indention in metadata.xml

2015-06-08 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Sun, 7 Jun 2015 04:40:47 + (UTC) Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: Well, yes, but vgacon is rather dated, now. Never heard of a serial console? It's dated sure enough, but I for one use them on a daily basis, and not by choice. jer

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: using Ninja in more CMake-based packages

2015-06-08 Thread Duncan
Christoph Junghans posted on Sun, 07 Jun 2015 20:08:25 -0600 as excerpted: 2015-06-07 14:19 GMT-06:00 Justin Lecher (jlec) j...@gentoo.org: On 07/06/15 22:14, Johannes Huber wrote: Am Sonntag 07 Juni 2015, 17:08:57 schrieb Michał Górny: CMake sucks a lot [but will suck less if we switch]

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Indention in metadata.xml

2015-06-08 Thread Justin (jlec)
On 07/06/15 22:22, Michał Górny wrote: Dnia 2015-06-07, o godz. 22:16:18 Justin Lecher (jlec) j...@gentoo.org napisał(a): -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 07/06/15 14:48, Andrew Udvare wrote: On 07/06/15 05:12, Alexis Ballier wrote: On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 22:00:14 -0400

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: using Ninja in more CMake-based packages

2015-06-08 Thread hasufell
On 06/07/2015 05:08 PM, Michał Górny wrote: Hello, developers. [...] It's not clear to me how the transition should look like. Are you suggesting Ninja to be the new default or do you want to switch per-packages after having tested them? If the former, then we need a tinderbox-run.

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: using Ninja in more CMake-based packages

2015-06-08 Thread hasufell
On 06/08/2015 02:01 PM, Michał Górny wrote: Dnia 2015-06-08, o godz. 12:46:42 hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org napisał(a): On 06/07/2015 05:08 PM, Michał Górny wrote: Hello, developers. [...] It's not clear to me how the transition should look like. Are you suggesting Ninja to be the new

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [OT] Re: Re: RFC: Indention in metadata.xml

2015-06-08 Thread Andrew Savchenko
On Sun, 7 Jun 2015 04:40:47 + (UTC) Duncan wrote: Andrew Savchenko posted on Sat, 06 Jun 2015 20:36:13 +0300 as excerpted: On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 18:35:41 +0600 Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote: * linewidth 80 (why do we have this short limit still in 2015) Actually, I dislike that

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: using Ninja in more CMake-based packages

2015-06-08 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2015-06-08, o godz. 12:46:42 hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org napisał(a): On 06/07/2015 05:08 PM, Michał Górny wrote: Hello, developers. [...] It's not clear to me how the transition should look like. Are you suggesting Ninja to be the new default or do you want to switch

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: using Ninja in more CMake-based packages

2015-06-08 Thread Franz Fellner
Michał Górny wrote: Dnia 2015-06-08, o godz. 12:46:42 hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org napisał(a): On 06/07/2015 05:08 PM, Michał Górny wrote: Hello, developers. [...] It's not clear to me how the transition should look like. Are you suggesting Ninja to be the new default or

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: using Ninja in more CMake-based packages

2015-06-08 Thread Martin Vaeth
Franz Fellner alpine.art...@gmail.com wrote: IMHO a working build system always is better than a fast but potentially broken one :) Meanwhile, it is not so clear which of the two systems is more likely the potentially broken one: According to some of the mentioned bugs, it appears to me that

[gentoo-dev] Openstack image availability

2015-06-08 Thread Matthew Thode
Hi, I've just started generation of Gentoo Openstack images. Right now it is just a basic amd64 image, but I plan on adding nomultilib and hardened variants (for a total of at least 4 images). I plan on generating these images at least weekly. These images are not yet sanctioned by our infra

[gentoo-dev] Re: [OT] Re: Re: RFC: Indention in metadata.xml

2015-06-08 Thread Duncan
Andrew Savchenko posted on Mon, 08 Jun 2015 16:33:55 +0300 as excerpted: On Sun, 7 Jun 2015 04:40:47 + (UTC) Duncan wrote: Andrew Savchenko posted on Sat, 06 Jun 2015 20:36:13 +0300 as excerpted: It will never be finished, because console-based workflow is the most efficient way to