Re: [gentoo-dev] samba (and related) packages are in desperate need of help

2015-09-02 Thread Eray Aslan
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 03:24:05PM +0200, Lars Wendler wrote: > * We should really get heimdal and mit-krb5 packages in a shape where > we can install them in parallel [2]. Using the bundled heimdal from > samba is no valid option [3] While bundling a copy of a kerberos implementation is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-lang/gnat-gcc/

2015-09-02 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/09/15 11:15 AM, hasufell wrote: > On 09/02/2015 05:06 PM, George Shapovalov wrote: >> On Wednesday 02 September 2015 16:29:52 hasufell wrote: - >=sys-libs/ncurses-5.7" + >=sys-libs/ncurses-5.7:*" >>> This doesn't look correct to

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-lang/gnat-gcc/

2015-09-02 Thread George Shapovalov
On Wednesday 02 September 2015 16:29:52 hasufell wrote: > > - >=sys-libs/ncurses-5.7" > > + >=sys-libs/ncurses-5.7:*" > This doesn't look correct to me, unless dev-lang/gnat-gcc doesn't need > ncurses headers(?). Only sys-libs/ncurses:0 provides headers (the other > slots are for binary

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-lang/gnat-gcc/

2015-09-02 Thread hasufell
On 09/02/2015 05:06 PM, George Shapovalov wrote: > On Wednesday 02 September 2015 16:29:52 hasufell wrote: >>> - >=sys-libs/ncurses-5.7" >>> + >=sys-libs/ncurses-5.7:*" >> This doesn't look correct to me, unless dev-lang/gnat-gcc doesn't need >> ncurses headers(?). Only sys-libs/ncurses:0

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-lang/gnat-gcc/

2015-09-02 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/09/15 12:31 PM, hasufell wrote: >> In terms of libraries in general, although the SLOT=0 for full >> package version / SLOT=somethingelse for binary-only stuff is a >> bit of a convention, you need to check what slotting actually >> means for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Better way to direct upstream bugs upstream?

2015-09-02 Thread Paweł Hajdan , Jr .
On 8/30/15 12:02 PM, Kent Fredric wrote: > Or upstream might be a monolithic giant like Google where their > upstream bug tracking is some pointless forum where you get ignored by > the people actually working on things. Ouch. Do you have specific examples? I'm not denying they exist. I just

Re: [gentoo-dev] samba (and related) packages are in desperate need of help

2015-09-02 Thread Paweł Hajdan , Jr .
On 9/1/15 3:24 PM, Lars Wendler wrote: > * samba upstream is extremely uncooperative. Best example is that we > still have some automagic dependencies [5] in samba's build system and > upstream is not very keen on fixing these. > > [...] > > [5] https://bugs.gentoo.org/489748 >

Re: [gentoo-dev] samba (and related) packages are in desperate need of help

2015-09-02 Thread Rich Freeman
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 2:28 AM, Eray Aslan wrote: > On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 03:24:05PM +0200, Lars Wendler wrote: >> * We should really get heimdal and mit-krb5 packages in a shape where >> we can install them in parallel [2]. Using the bundled heimdal from >> samba is no

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-lang/gnat-gcc/

2015-09-02 Thread hasufell
On 09/02/2015 02:23 PM, George Shapovalov wrote: > commit: 12dc193801fc938bb00bfe3b6a215383fa877532 > Author: George Shapovalov gentoo org> > AuthorDate: Mon Aug 31 12:24:34 2015 + > Commit: George Shapovalov gentoo org> > CommitDate: Wed Sep 2 12:22:13 2015 + > URL: