Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Staffing Needs page is out of date

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 7:45 AM, Gokturk Yuksek wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 11/23/2016 12:31 AM, Gokturk Yuksek wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> The Staffing Needs page on the wiki [0] seems a little out of >> date, there are still mentions of

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Userkit.eclass

On 28/11/16 19:39, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > For now who cares about other OS or distros. If Gentoo gets its house in > order > others may follow. > At the risk of a huge flame, remind me, who uses Gentoo again?! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Staffing Needs page is out of date

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 11/23/2016 12:31 AM, Gokturk Yuksek wrote: > Hi all, > > The Staffing Needs page on the wiki [0] seems a little out of > date, there are still mentions of "herds". I invite project leads > and members to update it. We added a reference to it in

[gentoo-dev] new eclass: tmpfiles.eclass round 4

# Copyright 1999-2016 Gentoo Foundation # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2 # $Id$ # @ECLASS: tmpfiles.eclass # @MAINTAINER: # Gentoo systemd project # William Hubbs # @AUTHOR: # Mike Gilbert # William

[gentoo-dev] Lastrites: app-text/stardict and app-dicts/stardict*

# Pacho Ramos (27 Nov 2016) # All stardict stuff and dicts are completely unmaintained and orphan for # years (#471350, #533632, #568472, #600718). Removal in a month. app-dicts/stardict-cdict-en-zh-big5 app-dicts/stardict-cdict-en-zh-gb app-dicts/stardict-cedict-zh-en-big5

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Userkit.eclass

On Monday, November 28, 2016 10:42:54 AM EST Alec Warner wrote: > > Generally speaking as a fellow who maintained thousands of systems (many of > which ran various operating systems.) > > You cannot rely on all OS vendors to synchronize uid / gid. You cannot even > rely on some single vendors to

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Userkit.eclass

On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 8:21 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > On Friday, November 25, 2016 11:39:15 PM EST Daniel Campbell wrote: > > > > I could see a use-case for someone wanting to install a given daemon or > > server with a specific user and/or group. I'm not sure this

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Support EAPI 6 when applying user patches.

On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 6:42 AM, Mike Pagano wrote: > > > On 11/27/2016 09:06 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Mike Pagano wrote: >>> If kernel-2_src_unpack() is called in EAPI6, epatch_user() function >>> inherited from

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Userkit.eclass

On Friday, November 25, 2016 11:39:15 PM EST Daniel Campbell wrote: > > I could see a use-case for someone wanting to install a given daemon or > server with a specific user and/or group. I'm not sure this is the right > approach (nor do I know what is), but I think we have room to think > about a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Revisiting version-related tree policies

Le vendredi 04 novembre 2016 à 10:16 +0100, Ulrich Mueller a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 4 Nov 2016, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > > > > > On 11/03/2016 05:11 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > > == Policy changes? == > > > I think that the following

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: kde-base/legacy-icons

# Johannes Huber (28 Nov 2016) # Masked for removal in 14 days. Gentoo temp workaround package. # Superseded by kde-frameworks/oxygen-icons:5. kde-base/legacy-icons signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Support EAPI 6 when applying user patches.

On 11/27/2016 09:06 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Mike Pagano wrote: >> If kernel-2_src_unpack() is called in EAPI6, epatch_user() function >> inherited from eutils.eclass is undefined. >> See bug #579188 > > kernel-2.eclass currently calls die