Re: [gentoo-dev] Removal of CVS headers

> On Mon, 27 Feb 2017, Robin H Johnson wrote: > Why did Repoman not complain about either of these? Repoman has been fixed in bug 579460, following the council decision. Also app-emacs/ebuild-mode was changed for removal of the $Id$ header, and I think a similar change was committed for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Printer drivers and net-print

On 02/23/2017 03:58 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 18:50:45 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>> On Thu, 23 Feb 2017, Andrew Savchenko wrote: >> https://projects.gentoo.org/pms/6/pms.html#x1-180003.1.1 "Category Names" >> >>> I don't see a requirement here, only note on most

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removal of CVS headers

On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 10:38:42PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > So what is your suggestion? Keep the status quo and leave all Id, > Header, etc. in place, including profiles and init scripts? Or are > these Ids only useful for ebuilds? I did not ever say it was going to be in init scripts.

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2017-02-26 23:59 UTC

20170223-07:37 aballier db28d57858 dev-python/astrodendro 20170226-01:19 bicatali 10da3b8d20 dev-python/breathe 20170226-16:43 bicatali 64accd661a dev-python/ntplib20170224-03:40 zmedico 011bfe3f17 dev-python/pytest-arraydiff

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removal of CVS headers

W dniu 26.02.2017, nie o godzinie 21∶16 +0100, użytkownik Lars Wendler napisał: > On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 19:59:19 + Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 03:05:09PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > As the council has decided in its 2014-10-14 meeting (and confirmed > > > again

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] python-utils-r1.eclass: python_wrapper_setup, fix exporting env

Fix python_wrapper_setup function to move setting environment variables for PATH and PKG_CONFIG_PATH outside the 'if'. Otherwise, they are only set on the initial invocation of python_wrapper_setup for the particular impl and do not apply to subsequent invocations (e.g. further distutils-r1

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removal of CVS headers

On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Lars Wendler wrote: > On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 22:07:48 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >>> On Sun, 26 Feb 2017, Robin H Johnson wrote: >> >>> The 2014-10-14 meeting did NOT specify what CVS headers were in >>> question, and it was later

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removal of CVS headers

> On Sun, 26 Feb 2017, Lars Wendler wrote: > There is no need to enable it by default. But it is a very nice way > to verify ebuild changes if being enabled locally on a git clone of > the tree. Ever since portage was migrated to git I had this line in > my .git/info/attributes file on my dev

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removal of CVS headers

On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 22:07:48 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Sun, 26 Feb 2017, Robin H Johnson wrote: > >> The 2014-10-14 meeting did NOT specify what CVS headers were in >> question, and it was later decided that this was $Header$, not >> $Id$. > >When and by whom was that decided? The

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removal of CVS headers

> On Sun, 26 Feb 2017, Robin H Johnson wrote: > The 2014-10-14 meeting did NOT specify what CVS headers were in > question, and it was later decided that this was $Header$, not $Id$. When and by whom was that decided? The unanimous council decision was to remove "CVS headers" and the obvious

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removal of CVS headers

On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 15:32:56 -0500 Rich Freeman wrote: >On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Lars Wendler > wrote: >> On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 21:24:38 +0100 Andreas K. Huettel wrote: >> >>>Am Sonntag, 26. Februar 2017, 21:16:28 CET schrieb Lars Wendler: I am completely

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removal of CVS headers

On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Lars Wendler wrote: > On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 21:24:38 +0100 Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > >>Am Sonntag, 26. Februar 2017, 21:16:28 CET schrieb Lars Wendler: >>> I am completely against removal of this header line. It does _not_ do >>> any harm

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removal of CVS headers

On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 21:24:38 +0100 Andreas K. Huettel wrote: >Am Sonntag, 26. Februar 2017, 21:16:28 CET schrieb Lars Wendler: >> I am completely against removal of this header line. It does _not_ do >> any harm and I don't understand why people want it to be removed so >> badly. >> Now QA again

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removal of CVS headers

Am Sonntag, 26. Februar 2017, 21:16:28 CET schrieb Lars Wendler: > I am completely against removal of this header line. It does _not_ do > any harm and I don't understand why people want it to be removed so > badly. > Now QA again wants to do a questionable action _without_ any approval > from

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removal of CVS headers

On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 21:16:28 +0100 Lars Wendler wrote: > How about QA finally starts acting on useful issues or at least do > actions that make sense? Part of the job of QA is to improve the overall quality of the tree. This includes going through and fixing historical

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removal of CVS headers

On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 19:59:19 + Robin H. Johnson wrote: >On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 03:05:09PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> As the council has decided in its 2014-10-14 meeting (and confirmed >> again in the 2016-11-13 meeting), CVS headers should be removed after >> the migration to Git.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removal of CVS headers

On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 03:05:09PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > As the council has decided in its 2014-10-14 meeting (and confirmed > > again in the 2016-11-13 meeting), CVS headers should be removed after > > the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removal of CVS headers

On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 03:05:09PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > As the council has decided in its 2014-10-14 meeting (and confirmed > again in the 2016-11-13 meeting), CVS headers should be removed after > the migration to Git. The 2014-10-14 meeting did NOT specify what CVS headers were in

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-vcs/veracity

# Johannes Huber (26 Feb 2017) # Masked for removal in 30 days. No maintainer. Dead upstream. # Current version is outdated. Open QA issues (#522676,#526284). # Bug #607998. dev-vcs/veracity signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[gentoo-dev] Re: Removal of CVS headers

> On Sat, 25 Feb 2017, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > As the council has decided in its 2014-10-14 meeting (and confirmed > again in the 2016-11-13 meeting), CVS headers should be removed after > the migration to Git. Until recently, this was blocked by repoman > still checking for the $Id$ line.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Printer drivers and net-print

On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 4:54 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 21:16:15 + Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 23:58:50 +0300 > > Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > > On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 18:50:45 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removal of CVS headers

On 25 February 2017 at 15:05, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > As the council has decided in its 2014-10-14 meeting (and confirmed > again in the 2016-11-13 meeting), CVS headers should be removed after > the migration to Git. Until recently, this was blocked by repoman > still checking

Re: [gentoo-dev] Printer drivers and net-print

On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 21:16:15 + Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 23:58:50 +0300 > Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 18:50:45 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > On Thu, 23 Feb 2017, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > > >>