Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites: app-text/acroread

2017-06-08 Thread Matthew Thode
On 06/08/2017 07:17 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > RIP acroread. > > The only PDF reader on linux that can properly parse PDF Reference XObjects. > > Thou shall be missed. > I'm not sure if it works, but qpdfview is the best alternative that I've found so far. -- Matthew Thode (prometheanfir

Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites: app-text/acroread

2017-06-08 Thread Jason A. Donenfeld
RIP acroread. The only PDF reader on linux that can properly parse PDF Reference XObjects. Thou shall be missed.

Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites: app-text/acroread

2017-06-08 Thread Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov
> media-fonts/acroread-asianfonts Is it also due to security issues? :D

[gentoo-dev] last rites: app-text/acroread

2017-06-08 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
In addition it doesn't start anymore (segv somewhere). 30 more days, then it's finally gone. # Andreas K. Hüttel (19 Feb 2017) # Dead upstream for >3 years. Closed source. Bundles outdated # libraries that certainly have known security issues (e.g., # icu-36 (!) or curl). Use at your own risk. a

Re: [gentoo-dev] New 17.0 release profiles

2017-06-08 Thread Michał Górny
On śro, 2017-06-07 at 23:05 +0100, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > On Wed, 07 Jun 2017 22:44:31 +0200 > "Andreas K. Huettel" wrote: > > > 2) Switch GCC from default-non-PIE to default-PIE executables. > > Yay \o/. It's a major change though. Will qa@ write us some docs > on the topic? Landing page:

Re: [gentoo-dev] New 17.0 release profiles

2017-06-08 Thread Matthias Maier
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017, at 15:44 CDT, "Andreas K. Huettel" wrote: > [...] > Obviously we're now in the test phase and the official switchover > recommendation > can only happen after gcc-6 is stable. This is also why I'm not touching > profiles.desc yet. > > Patches following for review (only

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-apps/postfixadmin

2017-06-08 Thread James Le Cuirot
On Thu, 08 Jun 2017 18:18:09 +0700 "Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov" wrote: > Well, actually, I think that whole webapps structure in gentoo should > be dropped or totally rewritten, despite of web applications packages > state in the gentoo repo. > It is unextendable, uncomfortable, no-gentoo-way'ish

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-apps/postfixadmin

2017-06-08 Thread Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov
Well, actually, I think that whole webapps structure in gentoo should be dropped or totally rewritten, despite of web applications packages state in the gentoo repo. It is unextendable, uncomfortable, no-gentoo-way'ish and so on. I think, it would even be better to just install apps in /usr/shar

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-apps/postfixadmin

2017-06-08 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
# Thomas Deutschmann (08 Jun 2017) # Unmaintained in Gentoo; Unpatched security bugs. # Removal in 30 days. Bug #608726 www-apps/postfixadmin If you are using www-apps/postfixadmin or want to keep the package in official Gentoo repository, it is now _your_ time to offer your help or this package

Re: [gentoo-dev] New 17.0 release profiles

2017-06-08 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 23:05:20 +0100 Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > - dev-lang/ocaml will need to be defaulted to pie. ml@ ocaml generates its own asm code and uses gcc to link historically this caused issues on hardened since gcc had pie in its specs but the .o files it was linking were definitely n