[gentoo-dev] RFC: UID/GID assignment for tss (59)

2019-11-02 Thread Salah Coronya
Hello, I'd like to reserve UID/GID 59 for app-crypt/trousers, app-crypt/tpm2-tss, and app-crypt/tpm2-abrmd . All of them create the "tss" user. Fedora uses the same UID/GID for the "tss" user. Pending PR: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/13532 Thanks, Salah Coronya

[gentoo-dev] RFC: UID/GID assignment for mongodb (481)

2019-11-02 Thread Tomas Mozes
Hello, I'd like to reserve UID/GID 481 for dev-db/mongodb. UID/GID from fedora is already taken, so allocating the next free. Pending PR: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/13529 Thanks, Tomas

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Require full $P not just $PN on stable/keyword commit messages

2019-11-02 Thread Michael 'veremitz' Everitt
On 02/11/19 08:54, Kent Fredric wrote: > On Fri, 1 Nov 2019 19:59:35 + > Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: > >> Thoughts from outside peanut gallery? >> >> Michael / veremitz. > I have an alternative that might be more pleasant: > > 1. Change repoman so that when its clear that: >- There

[gentoo-dev] CI now distinguishes new problems

2019-11-02 Thread Michał Górny
Hello, everyone. Today the CI system received another upgrade and was made aware of exclusion lists. This makes it possible for it to report new problems without triggering for all existing violations. In other words, from now on CI will start reporting violations on new packages and new

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: app-admin/linux-bench/

2019-11-02 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 2019-10-29 at 10:10 +, Manuel Rüger wrote: > commit: 0f5c4a120b506866a4405e7d6391839d919e13e5 > Author: Manuel Rüger gentoo org> > AuthorDate: Tue Oct 29 10:08:25 2019 + > Commit: Manuel Rüger gentoo org> > CommitDate: Tue Oct 29 10:09:05 2019 + > URL:

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Require full $P not just $PN on stable/keyword commit messages

2019-11-02 Thread Kent Fredric
On Fri, 1 Nov 2019 19:59:35 + Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: > Thoughts from outside peanut gallery? > > Michael / veremitz. I have an alternative that might be more pleasant: 1. Change repoman so that when its clear that: - There is at least one ebuild being changed - There is