On Fri, 2020-04-10 at 13:37 +0300, Andreas K. Hüttel wrote:
> Am Freitag, 10. April 2020, 09:58:37 EEST schrieb Michał Górny:
> > 1. 'Broken' status was removed, as it is redundant to profile status.
> >
> > 2. State names were changed from 'testing' and 'unstable' to 'degraded'
> >(broken sta
On Fri, 2020-04-10 at 12:19 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, 10 Apr 2020, Michał Górny wrote:
> > In Gentoo terms, 'testing' and 'unstable' are mostly synonymous,
> > so using the two names for different purposes is confusing. Use
> > 'degraded' instead.
>
> "Degraded" has a negat
On Fri, 2020-04-10 at 12:14 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, 10 Apr 2020, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > -In the main profiles directory, a file ``arches.desc`` is added. Name
> > -and location are chosen in analogy to the existing ``profiles.desc`` file.
> > -The format of ``arches.de
Hi Samuel,
Samuel Bernardo writes:
> I send this email to mention that it seems to be missing eclasses for
> JVM builders such as those I mention in this email subject. Dependencies
> and tasks management are hard tasks now that I think to have great scope
> for improvement.
Have you read the J
Last release is 2002
No reverse dependency
Hi Samuel,
> I would like to leave a suggestion for Gentoo portage ebuild review.
> Since there are some ebuilds in portage that become outdated for more
> than one year when there are new versions available, maybe could be
> possible to add a new step in Gentoo QA service to generate an alarm
> (
Dear Java team,
I send this email to mention that it seems to be missing eclasses for
JVM builders such as those I mention in this email subject. Dependencies
and tasks management are hard tasks now that I think to have great scope
for improvement.
Looking into the developments made in go eclasse
Looking also to changes proposed in GLEP 72 maybe my previous suggestion
would bring another profile status as unattended or ceased.
This would allow the transition for those that need to use old or
archived profile versions.
On 2020-04-10 12:31, Samuel Bernardo wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I would
Hi everyone,
I would like to leave a suggestion for Gentoo portage ebuild review.
Since there are some ebuilds in portage that become outdated for more
than one year when there are new versions available, maybe could be
possible to add a new step in Gentoo QA service to generate an alarm
(send em
On Fri, 2020-04-10 at 13:42 +0300, Andreas K. Hüttel wrote:
> > > "Developers should file stabilization requests, however, pending
> > > stabilization on these arches alone cannot block any further steps (as,
> > > e.g., cleanup of old versions)."
> >
> > Isn't that implied by exp status, i.e. sep
> > "Developers should file stabilization requests, however, pending
> > stabilization on these arches alone cannot block any further steps (as,
> > e.g., cleanup of old versions)."
>
> Isn't that implied by exp status, i.e. separate from this?
Hmm... do all "degraded" profiles have to be "exp"?
On Fri, 2020-04-10 at 13:23 +0300, Andreas K. Hüttel wrote:
> Am Freitag, 10. April 2020, 09:58:44 EEST schrieb Michał Górny:
>
> > Developers are not expected to file
> > stabilization +requests.
>
> This kinda changed in usage in the meantime (for, say, stuff like sparc and
> s390). The reque
Am Freitag, 10. April 2020, 09:58:37 EEST schrieb Michał Górny:
>
> 1. 'Broken' status was removed, as it is redundant to profile status.
>
> 2. State names were changed from 'testing' and 'unstable' to 'degraded'
>(broken stable tree) and 'testing' (pure ~arch) to avoid confusion.
>
Back i
> On Fri, 10 Apr 2020, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> -``testing`` for all architectures where "inofficial" stable keywords are
>> +``degraded`` for all architectures where "inofficial" stable keywords are
> I am aware that it isn't your change, but while at it, could you change
> "inofficial" to "
Am Freitag, 10. April 2020, 09:58:44 EEST schrieb Michał Górny:
> Developers are not expected to file
> stabilization +requests.
This kinda changed in usage in the meantime (for, say, stuff like sparc and
s390). The request was to CC them in the stabilization bugs if relevant.
How about
"Devel
> On Fri, 10 Apr 2020, Michał Górny wrote:
> In Gentoo terms, 'testing' and 'unstable' are mostly synonymous,
> so using the two names for different purposes is confusing. Use
> 'degraded' instead.
"Degraded" has a negative ring to it, so can you find another term?
How about "lenient" or "re
> On Fri, 10 Apr 2020, Michał Górny wrote:
> -In the main profiles directory, a file ``arches.desc`` is added. Name
> -and location are chosen in analogy to the existing ``profiles.desc`` file.
> -The format of ``arches.desc`` is as follows:
> +In the ``profiles`` subdirectory of the reposito
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
glep-0072.rst | 16 +---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/glep-0072.rst b/glep-0072.rst
index 74ba9e8..312525f 100644
--- a/glep-0072.rst
+++ b/glep-0072.rst
@@ -1,23 +1,17 @@
---
GLEP: 72
Title: Architecture stability s
Change the handling of slave repositories to the usual notion of 'slave
overrides master'.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
glep-0072.rst | 22 ++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/glep-0072.rst b/glep-0072.rst
index 763be77..74ba9e8 100644
--- a/g
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
glep-0072.rst | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/glep-0072.rst b/glep-0072.rst
index fe3e0e5..763be77 100644
--- a/glep-0072.rst
+++ b/glep-0072.rst
@@ -95,6 +95,8 @@ whitespace-separated columns:
Additional columns are ignored to allow for fu
Provide a combined description for every status that explains what it
means, how it's used by linting tools and how it affects stabilization
requests.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
glep-0072.rst | 46 +++---
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 27 deletions
I'm not aware of any profiles that should be set to 'degraded', so let's
focus on the immediate problem of stable/testing. It will also probably
make sense to wait before we start using the third state.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
glep-0072.rst | 7 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+),
While it should technically be ignored, I don't think it's a good idea
to encourage developers using it for their own purposes.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
glep-0072.rst | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/glep-0072.rst b/glep-0072.rst
index 56a5bc4..b60d269 1
'Testing' has generally nicer meaning than 'unstable'.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
glep-0072.rst | 10 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/glep-0072.rst b/glep-0072.rst
index 6fdee6b..56a5bc4 100644
--- a/glep-0072.rst
+++ b/glep-0072.rst
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @
This is really no different from marking the profiles exp, and there
seems no value in having this controlled in two places.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
glep-0072.rst | 8 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/glep-0072.rst b/glep-0072.rst
index 04f7f2d..a0aa5
In Gentoo terms, 'testing' and 'unstable' are mostly synonymous,
so using the two names for different purposes is confusing. Use
'degraded' instead.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
glep-0072.rst | 18 +-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/glep-0072.rst
26 matches
Mail list logo
