Re: [gentoo-dev] [kde overlay] Up for grabs: dev-util/arcanist

On Tuesday, 19 May 2020 21:47:51 CEST Gerion Entrup wrote: > I use this tool for my work. Is it in a fashion to push it to gentoo.git? > If yes, I can proxy maintain it. > > If I get it right, there is not real installation, but only "copy all in opt > and symlink the binary". Is is meaningful to

Re: [gentoo-dev] [kde overlay] Up for grabs: dev-util/arcanist

Am Dienstag, 19. Mai 2020, 15:56:53 CEST schrieb Andreas Sturmlechner: > KDE project has moved away from the unloved Phabricator instance to GitLab > (invent.kde.org), so there is no reason for us to keep this package in kde > overlay for much longer. > > If for some reason you still rely on

[gentoo-dev] Last-rites: sci-chemistry/nmrdepaker

# Andreas Sturmlechner (2020-05-19) # Stuck on Python 2 and pygtk, last revdep on dev-python/matplotlib[gtk2], # last release in 2011, bug #705650. Masked for removal in 30 days. sci-chemistry/nmrdepaker signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[gentoo-dev] [kde overlay] Up for grabs: dev-util/arcanist

KDE project has moved away from the unloved Phabricator instance to GitLab (invent.kde.org), so there is no reason for us to keep this package in kde overlay for much longer. If for some reason you still rely on kde overlay providing this package, consider picking it up now and maintain it in

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo Identity Provider

On 5/19/20 7:47 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > Do you have any specific solution in mind? > > [1] https://gitweb.gentoo.org/archive/proj/identity.gentoo.org.git/ I would suggest for SSO an implementation like the following with LDAP provider:

[gentoo-dev] Initial version of gander/goose statistics up for testing

Hi, We've deployed the initial work-in-progress version of gander/goose (formerly known as gentoostats) for testing. The goal right now is to establish whether it would work rather than collect useful statistics. However, all interest and testing would be appreciated. Few notes: 1. The client

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo Identity Provider

Hi Alec, On Mon, 18 May 2020 18:42:24 -0700 Alec Warner wrote: >TL;DR: What if we launched id.gentoo.org, an identity provider that >provides authentication for Gentoo properties? Basically, 1 username / >password for wiki, bugs, email, forums, and any other http >service[0][1]. > >Today Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo Identity Provider

On 5/19/20 4:42 AM, Alec Warner wrote: > TL;DR: What if we launched id.gentoo.org , an > identity provider that provides authentication for Gentoo properties? > Basically, 1 username / password for wiki, bugs, email, forums, and > any other http service[0][1]. > > > Is this

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo Identity Provider

вт, 19 мая 2020 г. в 09:47, Michał Górny : > > On Mon, 2020-05-18 at 18:42 -0700, Alec Warner wrote: > > TL;DR: What if we launched id.gentoo.org, an identity provider that > > provides authentication for Gentoo properties? Basically, 1 username / > > password for wiki, bugs, email, forums, and

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo Identity Provider

On Mon, 2020-05-18 at 18:42 -0700, Alec Warner wrote: > TL;DR: What if we launched id.gentoo.org, an identity provider that > provides authentication for Gentoo properties? Basically, 1 username / > password for wiki, bugs, email, forums, and any other http service[0][1]. > > Today Gentoo has

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo Identity Provider

On 18-05-2020 18:42:24 -0700, Alec Warner wrote: > TL;DR: What if we launched id.gentoo.org[1], an identity provider that > provides > authentication for Gentoo properties? Basically, 1 username / password for > wiki, > bugs, email, forums, and any other http service[0][1]. I'd be in favour of