On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 1:14 AM Alec Warner wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2020, 23:08 Michał Górny wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 2020-05-26 at 20:24 -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
>> > The TL;DR is that a crack team of infra-folks[0] have been putting together
>> > demos of CI services and things like gitlab /
On Wed, 27 May 2020 11:38:39 +0200
Nils Freydank wrote:
> Zoltan, I prepared a branch with khard plus metadata.xml and would
> like to ask you to merge it into your PR as you took deps of khard:
>
> https://github.com/holgersson32644/gentoo/tree/bump-khard
Hi Nils,
I already had a PR[1] open
On Wed, 27 May 2020 17:39:21 +0200
Piotr Karbowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 27/05/2020 01.31, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> > * dev-python/boto3
> > * dev-python/botocore
>
> Do you mind if I join you on those? I use them a lot, and I planned to
> comaintain awscli since Patrick is the only one current
On Tue, 26 May 2020 23:41:28 +0200
zo...@gentoo.org wrote:
> tisdag 26 maj 2020 kl. 19:54:51 CEST skrev Alexis Ballier:
> > On Tue, 26 May 2020 10:45:39 -0400
> >
> > Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > > > Note that having the 'pic' useflag should be considered
> > > > something to be fixed: rewrite the
Hi,
On 27/05/2020 01.31, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> * dev-python/boto3
> * dev-python/botocore
Do you mind if I join you on those? I use them a lot, and I planned to
comaintain awscli since Patrick is the only one current maintainer of
those, boto3 is vital part of it too.
-- Piotr.
signature.asc
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 5:16 AM Thomas Deutschmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is this really CI _vs_ Code Review? I.e. we can only have one?
>
I'll try to come back to this. We can make computers do anything, but it's
a question of limited time for me and for Gentoo as a whole.
>
> CI is nice and
On 27/05/2020 15:22, Guilherme Amadio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 02:45:29PM +0200, Toralf Förster wrote:
>> On 5/27/20 2:16 PM, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
>>> The problem when doing review on Github
>>> for me is, that we usually create new revisions. Therefore we don't see
>>>
Hi,
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 02:45:29PM +0200, Toralf Förster wrote:
> On 5/27/20 2:16 PM, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> > The problem when doing review on Github
> > for me is, that we usually create new revisions. Therefore we don't see
> > what's changed in new revision versus previous revision.
On 5/27/20 2:16 PM, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> The problem when doing review on Github
> for me is, that we usually create new revisions. Therefore we don't see
> what's changed in new revision versus previous revision.
That's my main concern with the current behaviour: a "git diff" often
Hi,
is this really CI _vs_ Code Review? I.e. we can only have one?
CI is nice and helpful. For example I usually don't start review until CI
sets green light but CI alone wouldn't be enough. Thought that Gitlab will
support same kind of hooks similar to how current CI is integrated into
Github,
> Works great for whom? How many deployments are we talking about? To be
> honest, I don't think I've stumbled upon a single instance.
> On the other hand, GitLab deployments are pretty common -- GNOME, Xfce,
> Debian come instantly to my mind. Then, there's Heptapod -- the GitLab
> fork for
On Tue, 2020-05-26 at 14:14 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
[...]
>
> >
> > Assuming that the pic performance penalty is really only relevant
> > on
> > legacy arches (like x86), here are a couple of options:
> >
> > 1. Disable pic on arches where tie performance penalty is small.
> > 2. Force pic
Hi,
I can add my already bumped app-misc/khard and start to co-maintain it via
p.m. project.
Am Mittwoch, den 27.05.2020 um 06:00:18 Uhr +0200 schrieb Zoltan Puskas
:
> [...]
> I'm happy to take dev-python/ruamel-yaml and dev-python/ruamel-yaml-clib
> either
> as a solo or as a comaintainer.
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 1:09 AM Brian Dolbec wrote:
> On Tue, 26 May 2020 20:24:56 -0700
> Alec Warner wrote:
>
> > The TL;DR is that a crack team of infra-folks[0] have been putting
> > together demos of CI services and things like gitlab / gitea / gerrit
> > and so on.
> >
> > Some of these
On Wed, 2020-05-27 at 01:14 -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2020, 23:08 Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2020-05-26 at 20:24 -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
> > > The TL;DR is that a crack team of infra-folks[0] have been putting
> > together
> > > demos of CI services and things like
On Tue, May 26, 2020, 23:08 Michał Górny wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-05-26 at 20:24 -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
> > The TL;DR is that a crack team of infra-folks[0] have been putting
> together
> > demos of CI services and things like gitlab / gitea / gerrit and so on.
> >
> > Some of these come in
On Tue, 26 May 2020 20:24:56 -0700
Alec Warner wrote:
> The TL;DR is that a crack team of infra-folks[0] have been putting
> together demos of CI services and things like gitlab / gitea / gerrit
> and so on.
>
> Some of these come in combined (e.g. gitlab offers repo hosting, code
> review /
Hey,
> I have transitioned to "away" state as I have to reclaim my time for other
> uses. Here I am trying to reduce the scope of my Gentoo responsibilities to
> make potential return to activity less dreadful and overwhelming.
>
> ...
>
> Call for co-maintainers or successors
>
Hi,
On Tue 26 May 2020 23:12:06 GMT, Andrey Utkin wrote:
> WIFI access point service:
>
> * net-wireless/hostapd
> (Co-maintained by zerochaos, still additional attention is encouraged.)
I can take it.
Regards,
--
Alarig
On Tue, 2020-05-26 at 20:24 -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
> The TL;DR is that a crack team of infra-folks[0] have been putting together
> demos of CI services and things like gitlab / gitea / gerrit and so on.
>
> Some of these come in combined (e.g. gitlab offers repo hosting, code
> review / pull
20 matches
Mail list logo
