Re: [gentoo-dev] News item for eudev deprecation

2021-08-24 Thread Sam James
> On 24 Aug 2021, at 11:24, Jaco Kroon wrote: > > Hi All, > > We run glibc based systems. No musl. But we don't use systemd. > > As little as a year back we still ran into issues with systemd-udev > variant breaking systems, the fix of course was to nuke it and install > eudev. Are we

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH v4] meson.eclass: several cleanups

2021-08-24 Thread William Hubbs
Use the compile and install subcommands of meson instead of calling ninja. This allows for the possibility of a different back end. Stop using the NINJAOPTS variable. Add --num-processes to "meson test" call regardless of whether MAKEOPTS is set since the default is 1 process. Signed-off-by:

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH v3] meson.eclass: stop calling ninja

2021-08-24 Thread William Hubbs
Use the compile and install subcommands of meson instead of calling ninja. This allows for the possibility of a different back end. Stop using the NINJAOPTS variable. Signed-off-by: William Hubbs --- eclass/meson.eclass | 20 +++- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] meson.eclass: stop calling ninja

2021-08-24 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 1:35 AM William Hubbs wrote: > > Use the compile and install subcommands of meson instead of calling > ninja. This allows for the possibility of a different back end. > > Signed-off-by: William Hubbs > --- > eclass/meson.eclass | 24 +--- > 1 file

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] meson.eclass: stop calling ninja

2021-08-24 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 3:59 AM Florian Schmaus wrote: > > On 24/08/2021 07.35, William Hubbs wrote: > > Use the compile and install subcommands of meson instead of calling > > ninja. This allows for the possibility of a different back end. > > > > Signed-off-by: William Hubbs > > --- > >

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2] meson.eclass: stop calling ninja

2021-08-24 Thread William Hubbs
Use the compile and install subcommands of meson instead of calling ninja. This allows for the possibility of a different back end. Signed-off-by: William Hubbs --- eclass/meson.eclass | 22 +++--- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Plans for a Gentoo/LoongArch port

2021-08-24 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Tue, 24 Aug 2021, WANG Xuerui wrote: > According to their earlier reservation[1] and actual vendor system > behavior, there are 3 possible values: > - loongarch64 > - loongarch32 > - loongarchx32 > Only the LP64 ABI is fully supported by the current upstream submission. > The

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item for eudev deprecation

2021-08-24 Thread Anthony G. Basile
On 8/24/21 6:24 AM, Jaco Kroon wrote: > Hi All, > > We run glibc based systems.  No musl.  But we don't use systemd. > > As little as a year back we still ran into issues with systemd-udev > variant breaking systems, the fix of course was to nuke it and install > eudev.  Are we certain there is

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item for eudev deprecation

2021-08-24 Thread Jaco Kroon
Hi All, We run glibc based systems.  No musl.  But we don't use systemd. As little as a year back we still ran into issues with systemd-udev variant breaking systems, the fix of course was to nuke it and install eudev.  Are we certain there is nothing (eg, LVM integration was our biggest problem

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Plans for a Gentoo/LoongArch port

2021-08-24 Thread WANG Xuerui
Hi Ulrich, On 2021/8/24 16:46, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Tue, 24 Aug 2021, WANG Xuerui wrote: >> It seems the discussion has gone quiet for a while now, so I take that >> we choose ARCH=loong over ARCH=loongarch according to GLEP 53? > LGTM > >> If that doesn't receive much objection, I'll

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Plans for a Gentoo/LoongArch port

2021-08-24 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Tue, 24 Aug 2021, WANG Xuerui wrote: > It seems the discussion has gone quiet for a while now, so I take that > we choose ARCH=loong over ARCH=loongarch according to GLEP 53? LGTM > If that doesn't receive much objection, I'll prepare and send the > first few eclass patches soon. We

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] meson.eclass: stop calling ninja

2021-08-24 Thread Florian Schmaus
On 24/08/2021 07.35, William Hubbs wrote: Use the compile and install subcommands of meson instead of calling ninja. This allows for the possibility of a different back end. Signed-off-by: William Hubbs --- eclass/meson.eclass | 24 +--- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+),

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] meson.eclass: stop calling ninja

2021-08-24 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 2021-08-24 at 00:35 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > Use the compile and install subcommands of meson instead of calling > ninja. This allows for the possibility of a different back end. > > Signed-off-by: William Hubbs > --- > eclass/meson.eclass | 24 +--- > 1 file