Hi,
I added the Gentoo project to Hackontest (for more information, visit http://hackontest.org/)
. Developers and users are invited to add feature requests for Gentoo
(preferably with links to bugzilla :-)). Hopefully, some of us
developers can get together and implement them at the
This conversation reminds me of Human Resources. They always have
'procedures' and 'career tracks.' Gentoo's chitchat about earning
gold
stars and brownie points is giving me HR sickness. You're asking
Michael Jordan to prove himself on the high school team.
You must be American.
I am
Hi,
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
Gentoo dev list to see.
If it's not too late for this month's meeting, I'd like to discuss the
possibility of including a new post in our developer base -
Please elaborate on how a full.fledged developer would differ from a
package maintainer technically. What requirements and/or
priviledges do you think could be reduced?
I haven't thought that through fully (in hopes of a few good
suggestions!), but off the top of my head, maintainers don't
On 06-Mar-08, at 2:35 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
Thomas Anderson kirjoitti:
Arch Testers don't have tree access. This proposal gives the
package maintainer the ability to commit their changes.
How would you ensure ebuild quality for these package maintainers?
Maintainers will also go through
Good day All,
Sorry for the thread hijack, but...
GWN: The GWN is currently in a permanent state of hiatus. I have no
intentions on spending another minute working on the GWN. While many,
many improvements have been made in the processes for getting the
automated data, getting articles has
Hi,
On 11-Jan-08, at 4:14 AM, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
Some of the scripts would need to be updated to work on a monthly-
basis
rather than weekly. Also, I still think that it would be good to
automate the scripts that run by putting them on infra somewhere and
having just the output mailed to
But shouldn't there be some sort of area at the top with links to the
other parts of the site, as the other pages do (the navstrip across the
top)? Right now there's zero integration with the gentoo.org site, and
even the old p.g.o had at least minimal integration with the other parts
of our
Denis Dupeyron wrote:
Please everybody, give a very warm welcome to Elias.
Welcome Elias!
Now, get to work :)
--
Anant
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Networking, modelling and predictive applications:
net-analyzer/ns
I can take over ns, if no-one has any objections or pet-peeves over
this project :)
- - --
Anant
- -BEGIN PGP
Christian Heim wrote:
It's my please to introduce to you Le Robert Zhang (also known as r0bertz
on
IRC), our latest addition joining the GWN Translators.
Oriental! A warm welcome to Gentoo, Zhang Le Robert :)
--
Anant
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Thilo Bangert wrote:
the packages in the attached list have no metadata.xml.
I have taken maintainer-ship of the following packages and modified
metadata.xml accordingly:
app-doc/doc++ missing metadata.xml
x11-libs/xclass missing metadata.xml
I couldn't find it either which is why I still use my server-side queries.
Another issue I experienced is that the date fields on our Bugzilla
can't be parsed. Every single date is displayed as 01-01-70 for me.
Anyone else with that problem?
I'm facing the same issues here. Although
It's my please to introduce to you Dawid cla Węgliński. A fellow with
enough weird letters in his name and who hails from Kłodzko, Poland, cla
is going to start a new artwork project so we are expecting a lot of
good quality wallpapers etc to follow. At least this time the German
conspiracy
On 29-Mar-07, at 2:26 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 01:19:45 +0530
Anant Narayanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I certainly don't think so. A lot of people *switch* to Gentoo
because of portage. Portage is a core part of our distro, and I
don't see it being replaced for a long time
On 29-Mar-07, at 11:20 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Have a look at [1] and all the open Portage should... bugs. Would
any of those improve the user experience for you? Can you think of
other features of a similar nature that would make your life easier?
That Portage works does not mean that it is
snip
See above: not every developer is technically capable of evaluating
the
underpinnings of the tools we use. For most of us, those
underpinnings
do not matter.
I find the reasoning to be quite justified.
It's probably a little early to initiate such a proposal, seeing as
the
PMS is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Vlastimil,
I think it lacks advertisement, IMHO many people just know there was
such project but have no idea if it was completed or what. And
having it
online (at least some demo) would help greatly so people can easily
try
it out without
Hi Ciaran,
On 28-Mar-07, at 1:45 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Do you acknowledge that Portage is a severe limiting factor when it
comes to improving the Gentoo user experience as a whole?
I certainly don't think so. A lot of people *switch* to Gentoo
because of portage. Portage is a core part
Many projects have old and nasty webpages. This has been a problem within
gentoo since before I arrived and probably has been a problem since we
started having webpages. One of the issues I wish to address is whether
or not writing webpages in XML (Guide or Project or something_else) is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
We should not have third-party projects be part of SOC --
specifically,
things that are not Gentoo projects. I'd lobby this whether it was
pkgcore or paludis being proposed, so don't bother trying to pin
partisan accusations. Point is, it's not a
21 matches
Mail list logo
