Re: [gentoo-dev] comments on how flamewars are handled elsewhere

2007-03-08 Thread David Grant
fine in Gmail. I've always felt that bitching about these kinds of things should be considered bad netiquette, but that's just me. At least Tom Wesley's comment could have been sent off-list. -- David Grant http://www.davidgrant.ca

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: treecleaner removals

2006-10-01 Thread David Grant
On 9/28/06, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer wrote:> Tach David,  0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)>> David Grant schrieb:>> On 9/28/06, Michael Cummings < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>>> +++ Ma

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: treecleaner removals

2006-09-28 Thread David Grant
On 9/28/06, Michael Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +++ Mark Stier [28/09/06 15:35 +0200]:>How about entering the removed ebuilds into bugzilla under an adequate>section?I think my original reply got lost, so just in case - seems like a time forsunset overlays ;0 or sunrise rather...-- David Gr

Re: [gentoo-dev] New dev: dev-zero

2006-09-27 Thread David Grant
On 9/27/06, Simon Stelling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all,It is with great pleasure that I announce the devification of Tiziano'dev-zero' Müller. He writes us:"I'm from Zurich, Switzerland. Born here and still living here  :-)I'm studying physics at the University of Zurich and working in a smal

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why you use Gentoo

2006-09-08 Thread David Grant
On 9/7/06, Chris White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: All responses off list please.  Please people, it's common sense to read emails before you reply to them. :-)-- David Granthttp://www.davidgrant.ca