Michal Kurgan wrote:
Recently new firefox-2.0 was released.
I (and probably many other users) am interested when this new version would
be unmasked and stabilized. If there are any problems, what are they and what
to expect if i would force installation now? Is there any roadmap or timeline
Christian Heim wrote:
Its my pleasure to introduce to you Christian Faulhammer (also known as
opfer), our latest addition helping with xemacs and the x86 monkeys.
Woo hoo! :D
--
by design, by neglect
[EMAIL PROTECTED]for a fact or just for
Petteri Räty wrote:
It's my pleasure to introduce to you Ryan dirtyepic Hill. He is
joining us to help with the endless x86 testing effort, treecleaners,
and gcc-porting. You might remember him for the work he did for getting
gcc 4.1 marked stable.
He hails from a town that most can't
Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh wrote:
So, are you proposing to encourage people to do commits for
the sake of commits? Make people do revbumps/keywording
just to get their commits in, without doing proper testing?
Or to hold on number of commits till commitfest?
I would hope that people would be
Jakub Moc wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
The profiles change over time. Currently, when the profiles change, the
only thing that has to be checked for conflicting USE behaviour is
subprofiles. With IUSE defaults, the person making the change will also
have to do a sanity check over the
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 14 October 2006 04:49, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
CFLAGS=-march=prescott -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer
here's a good reason why gentoo-wiki is not official ... this is wrong. the
duo cpu's are not based on the pentium4 which is what the prescott is
Duncan wrote:
Could you point me at some info on this one (-ftree-vectorize)? It came
up on the amd64 list a week or so ago, when someone asked what I thought
of it and why I didn't have it in my cflags (which I had just explained).
I said I didn't know enough about it to make a case either
Lionel Bouton wrote:
There are already good resources (http://gentoo-wiki.com/CFLAGS_matrix
was mentioned to me by robbat2) but they may not be advertised enough.
Most of the info on that page is wrong.
I'd like to propose a paragraph to the GWN editor which presents some
gotchas and good
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 03:48:53PM -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
Lionel Bouton wrote:
There are already good resources (http://gentoo-wiki.com/CFLAGS_matrix
was mentioned to me by robbat2) but they may not be advertised enough.
Most of the info on that page is wrong
Lionel Bouton wrote:
I'll wait and see if other devs are aware of common CFLAGS gotchas
plaguing bugzilla.
Flags such as -fforce-addr and -fweb that change the way registers are
handled can often cause errors when compiling hand-optimised ASM on
architectures with a very limited number of
Simon Stelling wrote:
Hi all,
It is with great pleasure that I announce the devification of Tiziano
'dev-zero' M�ller. He writes us:
I'm from Zurich, Switzerland. Born here and still living here :-)
I'm studying physics at the University of Zurich and working
in a small company as IT
Simon Stelling wrote:
Hi all,
It is with great pleasure that I announce the devification of Tiziano
'dev-zero' M�ller. He writes us:
I'm from Zurich, Switzerland. Born here and still living here :-)
I'm studying physics at the University of Zurich and working
in a small company as IT
Christian Heim wrote:
Its my pleasure to introduce to you lack, our recent addition joining us to
take care of the rox-related ebuilds.
He hails from Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada. When he's unplugged from his
computer, he tries to play some guitar and write songs (he even plays in two
Simon Stelling wrote:
Hello all,
I would like you to share your comments on the attached GLEP with me.
Thanks in advance!
I think I agree with the others. Excellent idea though; thanks for
giving this issue your attention.
--de.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Lance Albertson wrote:
From my point of view, it would have been nice to have at least been
asked what infra could do to host these tarballs down the road. That
way, we have a sound plan of doing a good release when they're ready. I
don't like the idea of them springing a release and then
So, wondering why people use Gentoo. Put [dev] or something if
you're an actual gentoo dev and [user] if you're a user. Doesn't
need to be fancy, you can put community or something if that's all
you want. All responses off list please. Thanks.
I use Gentoo because of its intelligent user
Anthony Ettinger wrote:
I get the following error when trying to compile mysql workbench from
the bugzilla ebuilds.
/usr/include/sigc++-2.0/sigc++/adaptors/bound_argument.h:158: error: 'const
class sigc::bound_argumentstd::listMYX_GRT_VALUE*,
std::allocatorMYX_GRT_VALUE* ' has no member named
Curtis Napier wrote:
I know christel is consulting with an accountant about adpot-a-dev,
Now there's a project we can get behind. QA might fall a bit though.
--de.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Elfyn McBratney wrote:
I've been inspired by the local/global USE flag threads recently
posted by Doug (Cardoe), and it got me to thinking... I've recently
joined the pkgcore development effort, and was asked by Brian
(ferringb) what I'd like to hack on/what my niggles with portage are.
My
Alec Warner wrote:
needs as far as QA. Last year Halcy0n petitioned for power for the QA
team; it was quite like a ball crushing power (fix it or we will) and it
seemed to have all kinds of frictional issues. This being a global
issue I would like to hear thoughts on how this could be done
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 23:11 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
I'd have to agree with you on that. I understand the appeal of
exciting press releases but there were over 75 GCC 4.1 bugs still open
for problems in *~arch* when the decision was made to go stable. Even
now
Carsten Lohrke wrote:
we're understaffed, partly - and this is my very personal opinion - the
problem is that releasing with GCC 4.x has been rushed
I'd have to agree with you on that. I understand the appeal of exciting
press releases but there were over 75 GCC 4.1 bugs still open for
Wernfried Haas wrote:
As far i am concerned, i find seperate sections quite good as it's a
clear solution as it's easy to see who is an official Gentoo monkey
who did all the quiz stuff etc. May be subject to personal taste though.
Some of the unofficial monkeys have also done the quiz stuff
Just a reminder that GCC 4.1 will be going stable on x86 and amd64 very
shortly (according to GWN at least), and is already stable on PPC. If
you have any bugs blocking bug #140707 [i] please have a look and CC the
relevant arch teams for stabilization. I'll be pinging bugs that
haven't seen
Duncan wrote:
Matti Bickel [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Thu, 10 Aug 2006 23:59:51 +0200:
Thomas Cort [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do arch testers need to post `emerge --info` if everything works?
Shouldn't we be able to trust that they have sane CFLAGS,
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
No. It really should be inline. I'm sorry if you think that 5K seems
like a lot of spam but having to open a browser just to look at
emerge --info is a complete waste of time.
*ding*
it's also nice to have that information actually _in_ my mailbox and not
of at the
Raphael Marichez wrote:
app-doc/chmlib is without an active ebuild maintainer and has an open
security
bug [1]
Anyone willing to take care of this package in the future, please update
metadata.xml and CC yourself on the bug.
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143181
if no
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 23:22:33 -0600 Ryan Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| Did you look at *which* actual Gentoo developers are on the list?
|
| You know, that was a completely unnecessary personal attack. God
| forbid anyone take the time to attempt
Alec Warner wrote:
Another class of packages I wish to discuss (not remove quite yet, just
talking ;) ) are older packages with stable markings. By Stable I mean
debian stable, IE we stabled it in 2004 and no one has touched it since.
Do these packages still work with a current system (linux
Alec Warner wrote:
I'm not sure if I'm misreading here, I'm not advocating we dump older
gcc versions. Moreso I'm advocating we dump code that doesn't compile
with newer gcc/toolchain versions that no one is willing to fix. We
have had devs in the past bring in far too many packages and then
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 23:20:16 -0500 Alex Tarkovsky
| This no QA accusation is a complete myth. QA led by actual Gentoo
| developers is indeed in place at Sunrise [1].
Did you look at *which* actual Gentoo developers are on the list?
You know, that was a completely
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
(stuff)
Me too!
Seriously, you nailed it on the head. How many times have you had this
conversation:
u: Why is it taking so *!#$!@ long to get KDE/Gnome/XFCE stabilized?!
Fedora/Debian/Ubuntu got it a whole week ago! OMG!!1!
d: It'll be stabilized once it's
Luis Francisco Araujo wrote:
The 'modus-operandi' would go like this:
1 - We setup a mailing list (yes, yet another one, but this one is gonna
be useful!) , call it , [EMAIL PROTECTED] , or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2 - Developers interested to serve as a proxy , subscribe to the list.
3 - Users ask
Simon Stelling wrote:
Hi all,
I just noticed that the USE flag 'firefox' is a local one. I think it should
be
global, though:
If this happens, could you also close
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96473 :)
--de.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 12:18 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
Should arch testers start working with 4.1.1 then? And do you want bugs to
block #117482?
Arch testers should contact their architecture's leads or Release
Engineering Architecture Coordinator. As for bug reports
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
My argument is that we must not filter -ffast-math or any other dangerous
cflags. The reason being that people will request more filters for all
packages that don't work with it. Many users will either ignore or miss the
warning messages. Filtering the flag basically
Ryan Hill wrote:
Just an update - I've finished most major desktop stuff for x86 without any
problems. I'm moving onto stuff that's already on the tracker and is fixed in
testing but not stable. Rather than open and track a ton of new bugs, I'd
like
to reopen the original ~arch bugs
Denis Dupeyron wrote:
Well yes, but an ebuild that dies, whatever the reason, hasn't much to
do with interactivity.
Fine. Call it the don't-kill-the-emerge-for-silly-reasons philosophy if you
like. I personally don't prefer it, but a lot of people think it's a good idea.
What will follow
Ryan Hill wrote:
2.95.3, 3.1.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3, 3.3.2, 3.3.5, 3.3.6, 3.4.1, 3.4.4, 3.4.5, 3.4.6,
My bad, 3.2.2 is masked for everyone ATM.
--de.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Denis Dupeyron wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but this has nothing to do with being
interactive or not. To me, an ebuild that dies (intentionally or due
to a build error) isn't interactive at all.
Their phrase, not mine. ;) I think the idea is you should be able to emerge -e
world and walk
Denis Dupeyron wrote:
In bug #139412, I ask Paul de Vriese why he thinks python should die
on --fast-math instead of just filtering it. Here's his answer :
Denis, quite simple. -ffast-math is broken and short-sighted for a
global flag.
Filtering gives the shortsighted message that it works
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
My options are either missing important announcements or creating this
list. I would prefer the list.
What important announcements are you expecting to find at the bottom 50-100
posts of random relevance? The announcements are at the top, being the thing
that triggered
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
OK, guys, I was speaking with vapier earlier about the possibility of
getting gcc 4.1.1 stable for the 2006.1 release. We've managed to build
some release media with it, and are planning on doing more testing with
it. What we really need is for more people to test
Michael Cummings wrote:
OK, I attempted this in November of 05 (then forgot?), but since no one
responded to my last round, it has been removed. Happy gentoo'ing,
*yay*
--de.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Harald van Dijk wrote:
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 05:20:47PM +0200, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
On Wednesday 21 June 2006 15:44, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
qt3 - enable optional qt3 support
qt4 - enable optional qt4 support
That will be a mess to support in the long run.
Why?
Ditto. Can anyone
Marius Mauch wrote:
Functional changes, bugfixes, etc. Let people use common sense there.
The intention is simply that people watching the bug don't have to track
the overlay as well to get notifications of important changes (like a
bugfix that prevented them from using the ebuild
Peter wrote:
Chris, I am not familiar enough about gentoo's hierarchy, politics, or
team responsibilities to question your sincerity or authority to say
something like: Sorry, but if it isn't supported, it doesn't belong on
Gentoo infrastructure.
Then please trust that these people who are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 09:11:38PM -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
LIRC_DEVICE? most of the USE_EXPAND stuff seems to be named for the device
rather than the driver. eg. ALSA_CARDS, VIDEO_CARDS, INPUT_DEVICES.
The ones you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
The --with-driver part will be moved to LIRC_DRIVERS. The name need not to be
LIRC_DRIVERS, tell me if you have a better name for it (LIRC_RECEIVERS is
another possibility).
LIRC_DEVICE? most of the USE_EXPAND stuff
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
It is my pleasure to inform you that after much discussion I can
announce that Joshua Jackson (tsunam) has come onboard to act as my
co-lead in Userrel[1].
Uh-oh.
- --de.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
Mark Loeser wrote:
At long last the devmanual is official. You can find it at
http://devmanual.gentoo.org. I would like to thank plasmaroo for helping
me with converting it to XML (since he did all of the XSL work to add in
the features we needed to make it easy to write and expand upon).
801 - 851 of 851 matches
Mail list logo
