On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 18:02 +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
Okay now that virtual/x11 introduced the new generation's virtuals, the
decision of waiting to have virtuals for iconv and libintl can be considered
concluded, and we might start adding them, right? :D
Proposed virtuals
On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 02:29 +0100, Spider (D.m.D. Lj.) wrote:
Hello,
I've been looking some at Michael Meeks -Bdirect patches, and the
possible performance boost they could give.
The good parts here is that it seems to be far less intrusive for the
running system than prelink
On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 17:56 -0800, Bret Towe wrote:
So, now I'm just asking for comments and/or discussion here.. would it
be worth the time spent on this?
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-10/msg00436.html
looks interesting personally id like to see how it acts on kde also
and
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 12:50 -0500, Ned Ludd wrote:
Good afternoon,
probably in portage-2.0.54 a patch will be added to emit split debug
info. Having a split debug allows us to retain all the advantages of
stripping executables while gaining the ability to properly debug
executables in bfd
On Sun, 2005-11-20 at 11:55 -0800, Michael Marineau wrote:
However changing this will also lead to many supprises and tick off many
users who don't know why a bunch of flags just vanished. How about we
leave the feature in portage but remove auto from USE_ORDER in the
2006.0 profile and put a
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 11:11 -0500, Seemant Kulleen wrote:
So, please join me in a hearty Welcome Back for Michael Cummings.
Yey! Great news :)
//Spider ,
Who's too fed up with bureaucrazy to willingly submit himself to
devrel. :-)
--
begin .signature
Tortured users / Laughing in
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 22:51 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Spider (D.m.D. Lj.) wrote:
| Why? Because they just install the hard RDEPEND, so if you have a system
| installed from binaries, you get working linking, but nothing will
| compile
Welcome aboard, We don't bite.. Much.
(usually we only stab people, and that's mostly due to bad puns like
those of lu_zero ;)
//Spider
--
begin .signature
Tortured users / Laughing in pain
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
end
signature.asc
Description: This is a
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 16:12 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Monday 24 October 2005 15:03, Spider (D.m.D. Lj.) wrote:
(usually we only stab people, and that's mostly due to bad puns like
those of lu_zero ;)
Strange that I'm still around then...
oh, you're not.. You just haven't
okay, this came up in a discussion today, and I figured it was time to
mention something about it here:
If your package, libFoo, installs .h files that directly require header
files from libBar, then you have a Runtime dependency on libBar, not
only a compile time dependency
Why? Because
- - Binary packages don't require the header packages.
Theese are the main cause of pain in situations like this.
Why? Because they just install the hard RDEPEND, so if you have a system
installed from binaries, you get working linking, but nothing will
compile for the system.
Theese level
On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 00:11 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The first release candidate was announced roughly 12 hours ago. And
fitting the Gentoo you know as up to the minute, so far beyond the
bleeding edge that it's wearing a Band-Aid before it
On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 22:26 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 20 October 2005 10:19 pm, Dave Nebinger wrote:
i still dont see how this addresses the nocxx / USE=-*
noFOO is used because FOO is on by default, and noFOO turns it off.
AutoUSE is the same way, package bar is
13 matches
Mail list logo
