Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 17/04/15 12:13 PM, Franz Fellner wrote:
Alex Alexander wrote:
Our bug queue has 111 bugs!
If you have some spare time, please help assign/sort a few bugs.
To view the bug queue, click here:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 17/04/15 12:13 PM, Franz Fellner wrote:
Alex Alexander wrote:
Our bug queue has 111 bugs!
If you have some spare time, please help assign/sort a few bugs.
To view the bug queue, click here: http://bit.ly/m8PQS5
Thanks!
Is there
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Would it be possible to add the tree categories as products and the
packages as components thereof?
It makes moving a bug from one package to another quite a complex task
though, as it requires two confirmation
Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It makes moving a bug from one package to another quite a complex task
though, as it requires two confirmation screens... and trust me that
happens often enough.
Shouldn't that just be scripted via pybugz? A GUI for that would be nice;
perhaps as a
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It makes moving a bug from one package to another quite a complex task
though, as it requires two confirmation screens... and trust me that
happens often enough.
Shouldn't that just be scripted via pybugz? A GUI for
Steve Long a écrit :
Mark Loeser wrote:
Making an actual bug wrangling team (subproject of QA) is something
I've been toying around with in my head. I'd love to get an actual team
set up so we can encourage users to help us get the information we need
in bugs so it is less work for us.
On 08:03 Tue 13 May , Rémi Cardona wrote:
We all know which devs/herds bugs should be assigned to, we all know most
bugs aren't complete if emerge --info is not provided, that sort of things.
But Real Bug Masters (tm) know all the dupes, know all the current problems
in our various
Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on
Mon, 12 May 2008 23:47:49 -0700:
Would it be possible to add the tree categories as products and the
packages as components thereof? That would significantly increase the
odds of correct assignment, because we
Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Would it be possible to add the tree categories as products and the
packages as components thereof?
It makes moving a bug from one package to another quite a complex task
though, as it requires two confirmation screens... and trust me that
happens
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 08:03 Tue 13 May , Rémi Cardona wrote:
We all know which devs/herds bugs should be assigned to, we all know most
bugs aren't complete if emerge --info is not provided, that sort of things.
But Real Bug Masters (tm) know all the dupes, know all the current
Denis Dupeyron schrieb:
That he comes back or not is of no importance to bug wrangling. Or at
least it should be. It is a mistake to solely rely on a developer for
such a task. Developers come and go without warning, he just proved
it, so ideally we need a team of 2 or 3 to handle bug wrangling.
Markus Ullmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Mon, 12 May 2008 15:49:30 +0200:
Fully with you, yet the other people who do bug wrangling occasionally
didn't do it as good as him mainly because he followed all major
mailinglists and knew the common issues
Mark Loeser wrote:
Making an actual bug wrangling team (subproject of QA) is something
I've been toying around with in my head. I'd love to get an actual team
set up so we can encourage users to help us get the information we need
in bugs so it is less work for us. Several other
13 matches
Mail list logo