On Sunday 20 November 2005 08:46, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 06:23:41PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > B) What should be done with the @(subdomain_to_be_determined) email after
> > an AT becomes a full dev (and presumably gets a @gentoo.org address)? For
> > how long?
>
> this
On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 23:46 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > E) What criteria must an AT meet to be able to receive the shortened
> >probationary when moving on to becoming a full dev?
>
> they express interest in becoming a full dev at which point they enter
> the normal 'becoming a dev' recr
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 06:23:41PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> B) What should be done with the @(subdomain_to_be_determined) email after an
>AT becomes a full dev (and presumably gets a @gentoo.org address)? For how
>long?
this is in the GLEP ... it clearly states that it will become a fo
On Saturday 19 November 2005 17:39, Duncan wrote:
> 8) Infra has expressed reluctance, and asks the question if we accept this
> one, where might it end? Legitimate question, but AFAICT, the question is
> no longer whether this is a good idea or not as it's already been decided
> to go ahead, but
Corey Shields posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
below, on Fri, 18 Nov 2005 20:18:24 -0800:
> On Friday 18 November 2005 08:02 pm, George Prowse wrote:
>> Of course, by being restrictive to the people who wish to help long-term
>> that is the greatest benefit to gentoo. If the @g.o email addre
