Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gcc-4.4 unmasking soon

2009-08-13 Thread Samuli Suominen
Ryan Hill wrote: It's best to keep the number of external packages needed to build the toolchain to a bare minimum. Anything that isn't a hard requirement should be a USE flag. We also need to be able to bootstrap without a C++ compiler, which one of graphite's dependencies (PPL) needs.

[gentoo-dev] Re: gcc-4.4 unmasking soon

2009-08-13 Thread Ryan Hill
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:27:26 +0300 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: Ryan Hill wrote: It's best to keep the number of external packages needed to build the toolchain to a bare minimum. Anything that isn't a hard requirement should be a USE flag. We also need to be able to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gcc-4.4 unmasking soon

2009-08-12 Thread James Cloos
Nikos == Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de writes: Nikos I see that the graphite USE flag is disabled by default. Nikos Are there any known issues with this new optimizer? I haven't found any using it on march=pentium3. It looks like debian has it enabled in their gcc-4.4 packages, and I've

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gcc-4.4 unmasking soon

2009-08-12 Thread Samuli Suominen
James Cloos wrote: Nikos I see that the graphite USE flag is disabled by default. Nikos Are there any known issues with this new optimizer? It looks like debian has it enabled in their gcc-4.4 packages, and I've not found any problems on deb boxen (32 and 64 bit systems on modern chips)

[gentoo-dev] Re: gcc-4.4 unmasking soon

2009-08-12 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 08/13/2009 12:39 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: James Cloos wrote: Nikos I see that the graphite USE flag is disabled by default. Nikos Are there any known issues with this new optimizer? It looks like debian has it enabled in their gcc-4.4 packages, and I've not found any problems on deb

[gentoo-dev] Re: gcc-4.4 unmasking soon

2009-08-12 Thread Ryan Hill
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:39:11 +0300 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: James Cloos wrote: Nikos I see that the graphite USE flag is disabled by default. Nikos Are there any known issues with this new optimizer? It looks like debian has it enabled in their gcc-4.4 packages, and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gcc-4.4 unmasking soon

2009-08-08 Thread Mark Loeser
Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de said: I see that the graphite USE flag is disabled by default. Are there any known issues with this new optimizer? None that I know of, but then again, I have not really played with it a whole lot to say one way or the other. If you want to test it, please

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gcc-4.4 unmasking soon

2009-08-06 Thread Samuli Suominen
Ryan Hill wrote: On Tue, 4 Aug 2009 21:15:57 -0400 Mark Loeser halc...@gentoo.org wrote: I'd really like to unmask gcc-4.4.1 soon, as in the next week or so. If you could please install it and test it out, I would appreciate it. Also, if you have any gcc 4.4 porting bugs assigned to a herd

[gentoo-dev] Re: gcc-4.4 unmasking soon

2009-08-05 Thread Ryan Hill
On Tue, 4 Aug 2009 21:15:57 -0400 Mark Loeser halc...@gentoo.org wrote: I'd really like to unmask gcc-4.4.1 soon, as in the next week or so. If you could please install it and test it out, I would appreciate it. Also, if you have any gcc 4.4 porting bugs assigned to a herd that you are a part