On Friday 28 August 2009 20:05:12 Alex Alexander wrote:
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 00:23, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 28 August 2009 16:27:18 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
10.0 is retarded
How would you like the problem to be addressed?
we already have a simple
On Sat, 29 Aug 2009, Alex Alexander wrote:
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 00:23, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
we already have a simple logical version system. 2009.0 is the
next step.
Years do not make a good versioning scheme, if one release gets out
late you're automatically
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sebastian Pipping schrieb:
Does sticking to dates have any real benefits?
YES - you don't have to think about another versioning scheme ;) It's
nice to see how people are switching to ${year}.${month} and after a
while discussing if it isn't better
Michael Hammer wrote:
Sebastian Pipping schrieb:
Does sticking to dates have any real benefits?
YES - you don't have to think about another versioning scheme ;) It's
nice to see how people are switching to ${year}.${month} and after a
while discussing if it isn't better to switch back to an
Samuli Suominen wrote:
You do realize all this discussion is now pointless as 10.0 profiles are
in place already? :-p
So what do we do?
Sebastian
Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Samuli Suominen wrote:
You do realize all this discussion is now pointless as 10.0 profiles are
in place already? :-p
So what do we do?
Sebastian
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-upgrading.xml
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Josh Saddler wrote:
So what do we do?
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-upgrading.xml
Please give more precise content pointers or summarize what you want to
point out.
Sebastian
On Friday 28 August 2009 04:09:01 Samuli Suominen wrote:
Michael Hammer wrote:
Sebastian Pipping schrieb:
Does sticking to dates have any real benefits?
YES - you don't have to think about another versioning scheme ;) It's
nice to see how people are switching to ${year}.${month} and
Mike Frysinger wrote:
10.0 is retarded
How would you like the problem to be addressed?
Sebastian
On Friday 28 August 2009 16:27:18 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
10.0 is retarded
How would you like the problem to be addressed?
we already have a simple logical version system. 2009.0 is the next step.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 28 August 2009 16:27:18 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
10.0 is retarded
How would you like the problem to be addressed?
we already have a simple logical version system. 2009.0 is the
next step.
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 00:23, Mike Frysingervap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Friday 28 August 2009 16:27:18 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
10.0 is retarded
How would you like the problem to be addressed?
we already have a simple logical version system. 2009.0 is the next step.
Zac Medico wrote:
With the introduction of autobuilds, would it be a good idea to rename
the profiles so that they don't have the date association? This does
seem to confuse a number of new users who will appear asking where the
2009 profiles are.
Maybe, but you could also look at this as a
We've been living with the 2008.0 profiles for a while now. I think the
time has come for 2009.0 profiles so we can have some updates. Also,
there are plans for an anniversary release of our LiveCD, so I think the
time is right to start working on a new set of profiles.
One reason I bring this up
Ben de Groot wrote:
We've been living with the 2008.0 profiles for a while now. I think the
time has come for 2009.0 profiles so we can have some updates. Also,
there are plans for an anniversary release of our LiveCD, so I think the
time is right to start working on a new set of profiles.
AllenJB wrote:
Ben de Groot wrote:
We've been living with the 2008.0 profiles for a while now. I think the
time has come for 2009.0 profiles so we can have some updates. Also,
there are plans for an anniversary release of our LiveCD, so I think the
time is right to start working on a new set
16 matches
Mail list logo
