On Sunday 15 January 2006 19:54, George Shapovalov wrote:
Ok, I got the answer from upstream and, as I expected, 2005 refers to the
language specification and is not a release version. Upstream in fact is
undecided at this point on what naming/versioning scheme it is going to
use, so we need
Hi All.
This is to inform interested parties that the split (gnat = gnatgcc, gnatgpl,
gnatpro) that I was describing recently is now functional and I ma ready to
commit the reorganized gnat (p-masked of course at this point). Please see
#111340 for details:
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 10:44:41 +0100
George Shapovalov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. 2005 stands for the standard revision namme (as in Ada 2005)
really rather than for a particular version.
To elaborate for those unfamiliar with Ada; this is the same sort of
thing as C89, C99. Enforcing the
неділя, 15. січень 2006 12:43, Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) Ви написали:
If the 2005 does turn out to be a release date rather than the
standard name, then it makes sense as a release version; gnat-gpl-2005
would be enough. Later releases can add a point revision if necessary;
if you do 2005.1
