[gentoo-dev] Catalyst{,2} and 2006.0

2006-01-03 Thread Kalin KOZHUHAROV
Some time ago I sent a mail with the above subject and there was no response... Now I saw it went to the gentoo-server ML :-( /me bad So, resending some thoughts about catalyst here... So far I have played with catalyst, lately catalyst2, since gentoo-1.4 was released. AFAIR, 3 or 4 times.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Catalyst{,2} and 2006.0

2006-01-03 Thread Rajiv Aaron Manglani
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote: So what about the first problem? Working, real configs for gentoo releases? I am thinking something of the kind, will it be possible/good/easy to start preparing a few configs for the next release (2006.0 right?), complete configs starting from say

Re: [gentoo-dev] Catalyst{,2} and 2006.0

2006-01-03 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 11:05 -0500, Rajiv Aaron Manglani wrote: On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote: So what about the first problem? Working, real configs for gentoo releases? I am thinking something of the kind, will it be possible/good/easy to start preparing a few configs for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Catalyst{,2} and 2006.0

2006-01-03 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 04:00 +0900, Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote: [unsnip] BTW, will next release use catalyst or catalyst2? [/unsnip] So? We will be using catalyst 2.0 (or better). But what about helping by working on an official Gentoo release? Learn catalyst intricately. The main problems

Re: [gentoo-dev] Catalyst{,2} and 2006.0

2006-01-03 Thread Tim Yamin
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 02:33:13PM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote: But what about helping by working on an official Gentoo release? Having somebody around to help test LiveCDs and stages is always a good thing. We need both developers and users to do this as the architecture coordinator can