On 27/10/14 12:07, M. Ziebell wrote:
Does clang compile glibc already?
At the last GNU Cauldron the speaker said that clang fails because
of:[1]
- nested functions
- VLAIS
How did you avoid that problem?
musl is known to work fine.
Am Wed, 29 Oct 2014 13:39:33 +0100
schrieb Luca Barbato lu_z...@gentoo.org:
On 27/10/14 12:07, M. Ziebell wrote:
Does clang compile glibc already?
At the last GNU Cauldron the speaker said that clang fails because
of:[1]
- nested functions
- VLAIS
How did you avoid that problem?
By the way, any help for maintaining the libc++ stack is very welcome;
as you can see from the age of the current snapshots, it's been some
time I've not been playing with it.
Some notes:
- why not adding a clang subprofile ? there's one for amd64-fbsd; I had
been able to build a complete
Alexis Ballier wrote:
- why not adding a clang subprofile ? there's one for amd64-fbsd; I had
been able to build a complete stage 3 without too much trouble.
There's probably nothing bsd specific there, so moving
generic code from there to profiles/features should work.
I'd try to test
Does clang compile glibc already?
At the last GNU Cauldron the speaker said that clang fails because
of:[1]
- nested functions
- VLAIS
How did you avoid that problem?
Marco
[1]
http://www.youtube.ca/watch?v=mmiDwKgn6Holist=PLOGTP9W1DX5U53pPxtWdKkyiqe3GAn6Nd
Am Mon, 27 Oct 2014 11:20:00 +0100
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 12:07:25 +0100
M. Ziebell ziebell_ma...@posteo.de wrote:
Does clang compile glibc already?
At the last GNU Cauldron the speaker said that clang fails because
of:[1]
- nested functions
- VLAIS
How did you avoid that problem?
by using freebsd's libc :)
only problem
Am Mon, 27 Oct 2014 12:10:51 +0100
schrieb Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 12:07:25 +0100
M. Ziebell ziebell_ma...@posteo.de wrote:
Does clang compile glibc already?
At the last GNU Cauldron the speaker said that clang fails because
of:[1]
- nested functions
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 12:29:40 +0100
M. Ziebell ziebell_ma...@posteo.de wrote:
Am Mon, 27 Oct 2014 12:10:51 +0100
schrieb Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 12:07:25 +0100
M. Ziebell ziebell_ma...@posteo.de wrote:
Does clang compile glibc already?
At the last
Am 27. Oct 2014, 11:14 schrieb Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org:
By the way, any help for maintaining the libc++ stack is very welcome;
as you can see from the age of the current snapshots, it's been some
time I've not been playing with it.
Some notes:
- why not adding a clang
Am 27. Oct 2014, 12:07 schrieb M. Ziebell ziebell_ma...@posteo.de:
Does clang compile glibc already?
At the last GNU Cauldron the speaker said that clang fails because
of:[1]
- nested functions
- VLAIS
How did you avoid that problem?
Even without this issues there remains the fact that
Could you please blog or add some notes to the wiki about it?
I've put up a preliminary version for the toolchain part:
https://gist.github.com/tamiko/7e3a0be806fac11f2a35
Best,
Matthias
11 matches
Mail list logo
