On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 7:57 PM, viv...@gmail.com viv...@gmail.com wrote:
Il 31/07/2012 21:27, Michał Górny ha scritto:
I'd be more afraid about resources, and whether the kernel will be
actually able to handle bazillion bind mounts. And if, whether it won't
actually cause more overhead than
On 7/26/12 8:26 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
I've been messing around with namespaces and some of what systemd has
been doing with them, and I have an idea for a portage feature.
But before doing a brain dump of ideas, how useful would it be to have
a FEATURE for portage to do a
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 7/26/12 8:26 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
I've been messing around with namespaces and some of what systemd has
been doing with them, and I have an idea for a portage feature.
But before doing a brain dump of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 31/07/12 10:55 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 7/26/12 8:26 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
I've been messing around with namespaces and some of what
systemd has been doing
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
Although that is true, it would be -WAY- too slow to generate said
list via equery/q* helpers; I think that's where the
extended-attributes and/or cache idea comes into play.
I agree. This needs to be high-performance
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 31/07/12 10:55 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 7/26/12 8:26 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
I've
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 15:16:34 -0400
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Although that is true, it would be -WAY- too slow to generate said
list via equery/q* helpers; I think that's where the
extended-attributes
Il 31/07/2012 21:27, Michał Górny ha scritto:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 15:16:34 -0400
Rich Freemanri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Ian Stakenviciusa...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Although that is true, it would be -WAY- too slow to generate said
list via equery/q* helpers; I think
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
It seems like you might need some kind of copy-on-write support, at
least to run pkg_setup. Apparently cowbuilder uses cow hardlinks for
that. Another way would be to use fiemap (cp --reflink).
Reflinks would be a much
I've been messing around with namespaces and some of what systemd has
been doing with them, and I have an idea for a portage feature.
But before doing a brain dump of ideas, how useful would it be to have
a FEATURE for portage to do a limited-visibility build? That is, the
build would be run in
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
I've been messing around with namespaces and some of what systemd has
been doing with them, and I have an idea for a portage feature.
But before doing a brain dump of ideas, how useful would it be to have
a FEATURE for
On 07/26/12 14:26, Rich Freeman wrote:
I've been messing around with namespaces and some of what systemd has
been doing with them, and I have an idea for a portage feature.
But before doing a brain dump of ideas, how useful would it be to have
a FEATURE for portage to do a limited-visibility
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
(Really, this observation is more about simply making the information
available; distcc could consume that information if someone chose to
do the work to add that functionality.)
Well, I'm not sure how to get the info out of
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
I've been messing around with namespaces and some of what systemd has
been doing with them, and I have an idea for a portage feature.
But before doing a brain dump of ideas, how useful would it be to have
a FEATURE for
On 07/26/2012 11:26 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
Implementing it wouldn't necessarily be hard - just create a tmpfs
under /var/tmp/portage, unshare off a new mount namespace, and
read-only bind-mount everything needed from the root filesystem
(including /var/tmp/portage/...), and chroot into it.
On 7/26/2012 11:26 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
I've been messing around with namespaces and some of what systemd has
been doing with them, and I have an idea for a portage feature.
But before doing a brain dump of ideas, how useful would it be to have
a FEATURE for portage to do a
16 matches
Mail list logo
