However, by bitching about problems, there are some users that decide to
check WTF is this warning, in turn they urge devs to fix it (and that is the
main point of QA,
right?), they report it with their bug reports and so on. In other words, the
problem gets _NOTICED_
by everybody.
IMHO, lea
Lares Moreau wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 10:34 +0900, Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote:
>
>> what about defining something like
>> GENTOO_LEVEL="n00b|user|know_how|master|admin|dev|guru" in
>> make.conf? And act acording to this, but trying to move the user up a level
>> or two most of the
>> time.
>
On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 10:34 +0900, Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote:
> what about
> defining something like
> GENTOO_LEVEL="n00b|user|know_how|master|admin|dev|guru" in make.conf? And
> act acording to this, but trying to move the user up a level or two most of
> the time.
This is what happens anyway, bu
Lares Moreau wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 22:10 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
>
>>>I see the point about not showing all the QA stuff to the 'regluar'
>>>user. Maybe only show this info on screen with --verbose set. As for
>>>the QA-warnings file, how does this differ from parsing the files in
>>>
On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 22:10 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
> > I see the point about not showing all the QA stuff to the 'regluar'
> > user. Maybe only show this info on screen with --verbose set. As for
> > the QA-warnings file, how does this differ from parsing the files in
> > PORTLOG_DIR?
> >
>
Lares Moreau wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 21:41 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
>
>>>On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 12:54:04AM +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
>>>
>>>
Currently there are quite a few ebuilds in the tree that execute dodoc
or dohtml for files that do not exist. I think it would be nice t
On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 21:41 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 12:54:04AM +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
> >
> >>Currently there are quite a few ebuilds in the tree that execute dodoc
> >>or dohtml for files that do not exist. I think it would be nice to have
> >>ebuilds die if thi
On Tuesday 27 December 2005 14:41, Petteri Räty wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 12:54:04AM +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
> >>Currently there are quite a few ebuilds in the tree that execute dodoc
> >>or dohtml for files that do not exist. I think it would be nice to have
> >>ebuilds die if this is
> On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 12:54:04AM +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
>
>>Currently there are quite a few ebuilds in the tree that execute dodoc
>>or dohtml for files that do not exist. I think it would be nice to have
>>ebuilds die if this is the case. To not break current ebuilds this would
>>only hap
