On 10/11/2011 07:49 PM, Fabian Groffen (grobian) wrote:
grobian 11/10/11 16:49:18
Modified: ChangeLog chrpath-0.13-r2.ebuild
Log:
Revert ssuominen's changes that were totally uncalled for and most
importantly broke the installation of this package on the main
On 11-10-2011 19:59:13 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
So I've missed one ${EPREFIX} for docdir= ? How about just fixing that,
and not crapping all over the package?
How about first asking the maintainer before you completely rewrite an
ebuild? I'm not innocent on this topic either (ask Diego
On 10/11/2011 08:05 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 11-10-2011 19:59:13 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
So I've missed one ${EPREFIX} for docdir= ? How about just fixing that,
and not crapping all over the package?
How about first asking the maintainer before you completely rewrite an
ebuild?
On 11-10-2011 21:01:40 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 10/11/2011 08:05 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 11-10-2011 19:59:13 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
So I've missed one ${EPREFIX} for docdir= ? How about just fixing that,
and not crapping all over the package?
How about first asking
On 10/11/2011 09:13 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 11-10-2011 21:01:40 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 10/11/2011 08:05 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 11-10-2011 19:59:13 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
So I've missed one ${EPREFIX} for docdir= ? How about just fixing that,
and not crapping all
On 11-10-2011 21:34:22 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
Thanks, the end result of installed files look now OK. Care to reopen
the stabilization bug? The changes are trivial.
Shall we stick to the policy and wait 30 days without bugs first?
I just hope nobody will take an example of the ebuild
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
I just hope nobody will take an example of the ebuild with code
duplication (multiple epatch calls), overquoting, redudant use of find
when rm is more than enough, ...
I haven't looked, but if we don't already, a
On 10/11/2011 09:46 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 11-10-2011 21:34:22 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
Thanks, the end result of installed files look now OK. Care to reopen
the stabilization bug? The changes are trivial.
Shall we stick to the policy and wait 30 days without bugs first?
OK, no
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:50:30 -0400
Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Samuli Suominen
ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
I just hope nobody will take an example of the ebuild with code
duplication (multiple epatch calls), overquoting, redudant use of
find
On 11-10-2011 22:38:10 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
This document should be fixed. Any comments about the patches belong to
header of those patches, available for possible upstreams as well.
Doesn't belong to ebuilds.
The devmanual doesn't suggest this is the way to go, does it?
So it very
On 10/11/2011 10:49 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 11-10-2011 22:38:10 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
This document should be fixed. Any comments about the patches belong to
header of those patches, available for possible upstreams as well.
Doesn't belong to ebuilds.
The devmanual doesn't
On 11-10-2011 23:00:19 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
The devmanual doesn't suggest this is the way to go, does it?
No, but it should.
different topic
--
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 10/11/2011 11:04 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 11-10-2011 23:00:19 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
The devmanual doesn't suggest this is the way to go, does it?
No, but it should.
different topic
still on the same one.
13 matches
Mail list logo
