Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-sound/mpfc/files: mpfc-1.3.7-INT_MAX.patch

2010-11-09 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday, October 28, 2010 13:51:05 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: On 10/28/10 7:42 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: Il giorno lun, 25/10/2010 alle 18.50 -0300, Alexis Ballier ha scritto: Am I missing something obvious or is it just hiding a bug in the linux headers? I see no usage of INT_MAX in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-sound/mpfc/files: mpfc-1.3.7-INT_MAX.patch

2010-10-28 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Tuesday 26 October 2010 12:11:50 Mike Frysinger wrote: On Monday, October 25, 2010 18:17:21 Alexis Ballier wrote: On Monday 25 October 2010 19:06:45 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: Il giorno lun, 25/10/2010 alle 18.50 -0300, Alexis Ballier ha scritto: Am I missing something obvious or is it

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-sound/mpfc/files: mpfc-1.3.7-INT_MAX.patch

2010-10-28 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: On Tuesday 26 October 2010 12:11:50 Mike Frysinger wrote: On Monday, October 25, 2010 18:17:21 Alexis Ballier wrote: On Monday 25 October 2010 19:06:45 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: Il giorno lun, 25/10/2010 alle 18.50 -0300, Alexis

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-sound/mpfc/files: mpfc-1.3.7-INT_MAX.patch

2010-10-28 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 10/28/10 7:42 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: Il giorno lun, 25/10/2010 alle 18.50 -0300, Alexis Ballier ha scritto: Am I missing something obvious or is it just hiding a bug in the linux headers? I see no usage of INT_MAX in the patched .c file... the maintainer already has done his due

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-sound/mpfc/files: mpfc-1.3.7-INT_MAX.patch

2010-10-26 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 10/26/2010 06:11 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Monday, October 25, 2010 18:17:21 Alexis Ballier wrote: On Monday 25 October 2010 19:06:45 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: Il giorno lun, 25/10/2010 alle 18.50 -0300, Alexis Ballier ha scritto: Am I missing something obvious or is it just hiding a bug

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-sound/mpfc/files: mpfc-1.3.7-INT_MAX.patch

2010-10-25 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Monday 25 October 2010 06:06:15 Samuli Suominen (ssuominen) wrote: ssuominen10/10/25 09:06:15 Added:mpfc-1.3.7-INT_MAX.patch Log: Missing include limits.h, required by recent linux-headers for cdrom.h and INT_MAX. Fix installation with recent coreutils wrt

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-sound/mpfc/files: mpfc-1.3.7-INT_MAX.patch

2010-10-25 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Il giorno lun, 25/10/2010 alle 18.50 -0300, Alexis Ballier ha scritto: Am I missing something obvious or is it just hiding a bug in the linux headers? I see no usage of INT_MAX in the patched .c file... Upstream seem not to care about fixing that; we used to have a patch to fix

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-sound/mpfc/files: mpfc-1.3.7-INT_MAX.patch

2010-10-25 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Monday 25 October 2010 19:06:45 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: Il giorno lun, 25/10/2010 alle 18.50 -0300, Alexis Ballier ha scritto: Am I missing something obvious or is it just hiding a bug in the linux headers? I see no usage of INT_MAX in the patched .c file... Upstream seem not to