On Thursday, October 28, 2010 13:51:05 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
On 10/28/10 7:42 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
Il giorno lun, 25/10/2010 alle 18.50 -0300, Alexis Ballier ha scritto:
Am I missing something obvious or is it just hiding a bug in the
linux
headers? I see no usage of INT_MAX in
On Tuesday 26 October 2010 12:11:50 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday, October 25, 2010 18:17:21 Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Monday 25 October 2010 19:06:45 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Il giorno lun, 25/10/2010 alle 18.50 -0300, Alexis Ballier ha scritto:
Am I missing something obvious or is it
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Tuesday 26 October 2010 12:11:50 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday, October 25, 2010 18:17:21 Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Monday 25 October 2010 19:06:45 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Il giorno lun, 25/10/2010 alle 18.50 -0300, Alexis
On 10/28/10 7:42 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
Il giorno lun, 25/10/2010 alle 18.50 -0300, Alexis Ballier ha scritto:
Am I missing something obvious or is it just hiding a bug in the
linux
headers? I see no usage of INT_MAX in the patched .c file...
the maintainer already has done his due
On 10/26/2010 06:11 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday, October 25, 2010 18:17:21 Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Monday 25 October 2010 19:06:45 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Il giorno lun, 25/10/2010 alle 18.50 -0300, Alexis Ballier ha scritto:
Am I missing something obvious or is it just hiding a bug
On Monday 25 October 2010 06:06:15 Samuli Suominen (ssuominen) wrote:
ssuominen10/10/25 09:06:15
Added:mpfc-1.3.7-INT_MAX.patch
Log:
Missing include limits.h, required by recent linux-headers for cdrom.h
and INT_MAX. Fix installation with recent coreutils wrt
Il giorno lun, 25/10/2010 alle 18.50 -0300, Alexis Ballier ha scritto:
Am I missing something obvious or is it just hiding a bug in the
linux
headers? I see no usage of INT_MAX in the patched .c file...
Upstream seem not to care about fixing that; we used to have a patch to
fix
On Monday 25 October 2010 19:06:45 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Il giorno lun, 25/10/2010 alle 18.50 -0300, Alexis Ballier ha scritto:
Am I missing something obvious or is it just hiding a bug in the
linux
headers? I see no usage of INT_MAX in the patched .c file...
Upstream seem not to