Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, x11-libs/fox-1.2.6-r3 was added to the tree which fixed the
> virtual/x11 and GCC 4.1 compile issues. It was marked stable on all
> archs except alpha. Someone doing some cleanup accidentally removed it
> from the tree instead of the broken -r2.
This
Ryan Hill napsal(a):
> Ryan Hill wrote:
>> Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- wrote:
>
>>> I commented this out of package.mask. x11-libs/fox-1.2.6-r2 still uses it.
>>> Need to fix that up before masking it.
>
>> I'll have a look.
>
> Okay, x11-libs/fox-1.2.6-r3 was added to the tree which fixed th
Ryan Hill wrote:
> Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- wrote:
>> I commented this out of package.mask. x11-libs/fox-1.2.6-r2 still uses it.
>> Need to fix that up before masking it.
> I'll have a look.
Okay, x11-libs/fox-1.2.6-r3 was added to the tree which fixed the
virtual/x11 and GCC 4.1 compile i
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Well, if it's reached the "take drastic action" stage (which, let's
> face it, it has at this point), why not go and fix the tree? It's a
> better solution than breaking it, and anyone who moans now isn't going
> to get any sympathy from anyone.
I'm fixing it now. The br
Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- wrote:
> I commented this out of package.mask. x11-libs/fox-1.2.6-r2 still uses it.
> Need to fix that up before masking it.
It doesn't seem to build.
FXColorSelector.cpp: In member function 'long int
FX::FXColorSelector::onUpdAlphaText(FX::FXObject*, FX::FXSelector
I commented this out of package.mask. x11-libs/fox-1.2.6-r2 still uses it.
Need to fix that up before masking it.
Michael Sterrett
-Mr. Bones.-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
Hi,
virtual/x11 has been deprecated for some time and now that all packages that
o
