[gentoo-dev] Re: Another council topic for Feb

2007-02-04 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Mike Doty [EMAIL PROTECTED]: We're going to talk about arch keywording policies. IMO we should have a standard policy if you own and use ${ARCH} then you may keyword your packages for ${ARCH} with the exception of the sys-*/ categories. No, please not. Arch teams often discovered problems

[gentoo-dev] Re: Another council topic for Feb

2007-02-03 Thread Markus Ullmann
Mike Doty schrieb: Speakup now to get your input in. Why opening up the keywording like that? Most times a friendly ping on irc to get permissions to keyword x packages on own hardware succeedes and you're done. communication++ Jokey -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Re: Another council topic for Feb

2007-02-03 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 03 February 2007, Mike Doty wrote: We're going to talk about arch keywording policies. IMO we should have a standard policy if you own and use ${ARCH} then you may keyword your packages for ${ARCH} with the exception of the sys-*/ categories. after all the pains we went through to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Another council topic for Feb

2007-02-03 Thread Andrej Kacian
On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 17:17:40 -0500 Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: after all the pains we went through to enforce if you want to stabilize on $ARCH, talk to the $ARCH team, how is this a good thing ? I think Mike meant adding ~arch keywords - if you own and use ${ARCH} then you may

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Another council topic for Feb

2007-02-03 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 03 February 2007, Andrej Kacian wrote: (keyword, not stabilize) keywording $ARCH and stabilizing mean the same thing to me -mike pgpWOeiXy7ljw.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Another council topic for Feb

2007-02-03 Thread Jason Wever
On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 23:31:02 +0100 Andrej Kacian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As for the proposal itself, I'd add a suggestion to let the arch team know by e-mail about it, so they can maintain general knowledge (better wording here, probably) about their (~)keyword in the tree. Please do not