Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP XX: Fix the GLEP process

2005-12-13 Thread George Shapovalov
On Tuesday, 13. December 2005 03:42, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > After that, I'll probably question replacing a single author with a > committee. We don't want to end up designing things like Ada, after > all... Hm, why not? It works, and wors well.. George -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP XX: Fix the GLEP process

2005-12-12 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 21:35:40 -0500 Dan Meltzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | If everyone but infra was in favor of glep 41, are you saying it | should be approved? Nope. I'm questioning the use of the word "involved". After that, I'll probably question replacing a single author with a committee. W

[gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP XX: Fix the GLEP process

2005-12-12 Thread Dan Meltzer
If everyone but infra was in favor of glep 41, are you saying it should be approved? On 12/12/05, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:15:43 +0900 Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | A GLEP should list whom has been solicited and provide evidence that > |