On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 01:13:08 + (UTC) Duncan wrote:
Andrew Savchenko posted on Tue, 20 Jan 2015 23:59:23 +0300 as excerpted:
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 12:17:35 -0800 Christopher Head wrote:
On January 20, 2015 12:47:03 AM PST, Alexis Ballier
aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
So, you're telling me
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 01:13:08 + (UTC)
Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
(a lot)
Thank you, Duncan. You explained by position perfectly.
--
Christopher Head
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Andrew Savchenko posted on Tue, 20 Jan 2015 23:59:23 +0300 as excerpted:
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 12:17:35 -0800 Christopher Head wrote:
On January 20, 2015 12:47:03 AM PST, Alexis Ballier
aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
So, you're telling me that if you have a list of 90 cpu extensions,
you will from
Christopher Head ch...@chead.ca wrote:
All that requires is knowing the names, though; it would be
fine if no package actually uses the feature yet.
++
More precisely: When changing the names anyway,
IMHO it would be a very good idea to follow the convention of the
flag names in /proc/cpuinfo
Il 15/01/2015 11:30, Alexis Ballier ha scritto:
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 10:20:15 + (UTC)
Martin Vaeth mar...@mvath.de wrote:
Christopher Head ch...@chead.ca wrote:
All that requires is knowing the names, though; it would be
fine if no package actually uses the feature yet.
++
More
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 11:50:25 +0100
viv...@gmail.com viv...@gmail.com wrote:
Il 15/01/2015 11:30, Alexis Ballier ha scritto:
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 10:20:15 + (UTC)
Martin Vaeth mar...@mvath.de wrote:
Christopher Head ch...@chead.ca wrote:
All that requires is knowing the names,
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 10:20:15 + (UTC)
Martin Vaeth mar...@mvath.de wrote:
Christopher Head ch...@chead.ca wrote:
All that requires is knowing the names, though; it would be
fine if no package actually uses the feature yet.
++
More precisely: When changing the names anyway,
IMHO
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
More precisely: When changing the names anyway,
IMHO it would be a very good idea to follow the convention of the
flag names in /proc/cpuinfo and add all flags supported
there as possible USE-flags, no matter, whether they are currently
used in
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 12:03:27 + (UTC)
Martin Vaeth mar...@mvath.de wrote:
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
More precisely: When changing the names anyway,
IMHO it would be a very good idea to follow the convention of
the flag names in /proc/cpuinfo and add all flags
