-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 09/02/13 07:52 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Sat, 09 Feb 2013 23:38:35 +1100 Michael Palimaka
kensing...@gentoo.org wrote:
I even noticed some maintainers adding subslots dependencies on
libraries that do not yet define subslots. This too
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 01:09:38 +1100
Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 9/02/2013 23:52, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Sat, 09 Feb 2013 23:38:35 +1100
Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org wrote:
I even noticed some maintainers adding subslots dependencies on
libraries that do
Hi,
On 9/02/2013 23:15, Alexis Ballier wrote:
Dear fellow developers,
I hope this will be trivial to most of you but after seeing bug #455900
and the vast majority of developers not even thinking twice before
sedding their dep strings, I believe this needs some attention.
What is wrong with
On Sat, 09 Feb 2013 23:38:35 +1100
Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi,
On 9/02/2013 23:15, Alexis Ballier wrote:
Dear fellow developers,
I hope this will be trivial to most of you but after seeing bug
#455900 and the vast majority of developers not even thinking twice
On Sat, 09 Feb 2013 23:38:35 +1100
Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org wrote:
I even noticed some maintainers adding subslots dependencies on
libraries that do not yet define subslots. This too seems reasonable,
given that there would be no impact until the library defines a
(sensible)
On 10/02/2013 00:47, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 09/02/13 14:15, Alexis Ballier wrote:
Dear fellow developers,
I didn't find anything to reply directly here, so sorry for stealing
this message.
I just wanted to point out that people have lately been adding deps like:
media-libs/libpng:=
On 9/02/2013 23:52, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Sat, 09 Feb 2013 23:38:35 +1100
Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org wrote:
I even noticed some maintainers adding subslots dependencies on
libraries that do not yet define subslots. This too seems reasonable,
given that there would be no impact
On 02/09/2013 06:05 AM, Michael Palimaka wrote:
Is there a difference in behaviour between 'media-libs/libpng:=' and
'media-libs/libpng' with no slot information at all?
I don't know if you phrased your question as intended. Anyway, yes, the
difference is that one with the slot-operator will
On 10/02/2013 03:06, Zac Medico wrote:
On 02/09/2013 06:05 AM, Michael Palimaka wrote:
Is there a difference in behaviour between 'media-libs/libpng:=' and
'media-libs/libpng' with no slot information at all?
I don't know if you phrased your question as intended. Anyway, yes, the
difference
On 09/02/13 18:36, Michael Palimaka wrote:
Eg. He wrote we should use 'media-libs/libpng:0=', but pre-subslots, the
:0 was often (incorrectly?) omitted.
I've at least been adding :0 to many packages, openssl, tiff, libpng ...
... pretty much ever since the libpng 1.4 upgrade problem in the
El sáb, 09-02-2013 a las 18:39 +0200, Samuli Suominen escribió:
On 09/02/13 18:36, Michael Palimaka wrote:
Eg. He wrote we should use 'media-libs/libpng:0=', but pre-subslots, the
:0 was often (incorrectly?) omitted.
I've at least been adding :0 to many packages, openssl, tiff, libpng ...
11 matches
Mail list logo
