[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Maintainer notes in metadata.xml?

2010-12-03 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Il giorno ven, 03/12/2010 alle 14.50 +0300, Peter Volkov ha scritto: Same logic applies for metadata.xml. Personally doing AT work I always review ebuild. At the same time I never opened metadata.xml, so I don't see your point. Have you read my post? I said to make _repoman_ spew the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Maintainer notes in metadata.xml?

2010-12-03 Thread Peter Volkov
В Птн, 03/12/2010 в 13:12 +0100, Diego Elio Pettenò пишет: Il giorno ven, 03/12/2010 alle 14.50 +0300, Peter Volkov ha scritto: Same logic applies for metadata.xml. Personally doing AT work I always review ebuild. At the same time I never opened metadata.xml, so I don't see your point.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Maintainer notes in metadata.xml?

2010-12-01 Thread Richard Freeman
On 12/01/2010 01:16 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: Il giorno mer, 01/12/2010 alle 19.05 +0100, Thomas Kahle ha scritto: I agree, comments within the ebuild are practically invisible to archteams (at least to me for x86). But also running repoman is usually the final step, right before