On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 15:37:13 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
Offhand... and this makes it a bit more complex, but still tenuable
imo, but we could get around this via shoving the symlink pathway into
the shebang itself.
scenario 1:
Script gets installed for 2.7, 3.1, 3.2;
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:00:43PM +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
Either way, thoughts?
It looks like you haven't looked at the python-r1 effort. That means
you probably also aren't subscribed to the gentoo-python
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 5:15 AM, Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
If folks haven't looked at python_generate_wrapper_scripts in
python.eclass, I'd suggest doing so. For examples of it's usage, grep
for 'python_generate_wrapper_scripts' in /usr/bin/; any place you see
it, look for
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:28:59AM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 5:15 AM, Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
If we are somehow going to eliminate the installation of a separate
script for each python version, then the symlink idea sounds like a
good solution for
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:28:59AM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
Regarding your /usr/bin/python3.2 /usr/bin/sphinx-build example:
invoking python on a binary (or a symlink to a binary) isn't going to
work at all. So I don't
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:28:59AM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
Regarding your /usr/bin/python3.2 /usr/bin/sphinx-build example:
invoking python on a
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 04:50:04PM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:28:59AM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
Regarding your /usr/bin/python3.2 /usr/bin/sphinx-build example:
invoking python on a binary
