Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Tuesday 03 January 2006 04:30, Luis F. Araujo wrote:
Now if i change to =app-text/xpdf-3.01-r4 , it works just fine.
But you significantly change its meaning.
I am not sure what it is happening here though... is the ! notation
broken?
On Tuesday 03 January 2006 20:25, Luis F. Araujo wrote:
So i suppose we should avoid using this kind of notation whenever possible.
Or you can try to fix portage.
Which dep?
xpdf.
poppler does _not_ require xpdf.
! allows to avoid installing older xpdf and newer poppler at the same time
if you
On Tuesday 03 January 2006 20:25, Luis F. Araujo wrote:
Portage does not resolve block correctly, look at bugzilla there are tons
of bugs open.
So i suppose we should avoid using this kind of notation whenever possible.
See, it's not possible to avoid that with the current Portage version.
Spider (DmD Lj) wrote:
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 10:35 +0100, Alexandre Buisse wrote:
After my last sync, I have this new block between evince and xpdf, which
is a problem at least to me.
Isn't there any way to make xpdf and poppler live together on the same
system?
Yeah. : )
See,
On Tuesday 03 January 2006 04:30, Luis F. Araujo wrote:
Now if i change to =app-text/xpdf-3.01-r4 , it works just fine.
But you significantly change its meaning.
I am not sure what it is happening here though... is the ! notation
broken?
Portage does not resolve block correctly, look at
On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 14:08:18 +0100, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
On Wednesday 28 December 2005 17:32, you wrote:
It's not supposed to break runtime dependencies. Everything that was
installed before is installed now, in the same location.
But installed by another package. Of course it
On Monday 02 January 2006 10:35, Alexandre Buisse wrote:
Isn't there any way to make xpdf and poppler live together on the same
system?
emerge unmerge xpdf
emerge -u poppler
emerge xpdf
--
Diego Flameeyes Pettenò - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/
Gentoo/ALT lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video,
On Monday 02 January 2006 10:35, Alexandre Buisse wrote:
Isn't there any way to make xpdf and poppler live together on the same
system?
This is not about not being able to run both xpdf and poppler on one system.
The blocker exists, because one ebuild of one package installs now files
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 10:35 +0100, Alexandre Buisse wrote:
After my last sync, I have this new block between evince and xpdf, which
is a problem at least to me.
Isn't there any way to make xpdf and poppler live together on the same
system?
Yeah. : )
See, poppler blocks against -older-
On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 17:18 +0100, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
Hi Daniel,
what you've done breaks runtime dependencies, if not for other packages so at
least for KDE. Such a change should be announced on the gentoo-dev mailing
list before you do it. Also a tracking bug to coordinate
On Wednesday 28 December 2005 17:32, you wrote:
It's not supposed to break runtime dependencies. Everything that was
installed before is installed now, in the same location.
But installed by another package. Of course it breaks dependencies when you
depend on xpdf, because you expect it
11 matches
Mail list logo
